Comments on: Hillary: stop talking about the campaign, and campaign http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/02/14/hillary-stop-talking-about-the-campaign/ Anderson + Koo = Anderkoo Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:17:27 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 By: Eunice http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/02/14/hillary-stop-talking-about-the-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-19165 Eunice Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:18:58 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/02/14/hillary-stop-talking-about-the-campa#comment-19165 Hillary is about the most non-feminist figure I can think of. She keeps hanging on the coat tails of her former president husband, touting the "successess" of his presidency as her own. Now he has been doing some campaigning for her with lack-luster results. We'll all be better off with her and her husband's brand of politicing sail off into the sunset. It's time for a new way of doing things, as in the grassroots campaign of Obama, putting little reliance on PAC's. PAC's are the major culprit of the present lack of activity in Washington today. One special interest is pitted against the other. Decisions being made by who can buy more influence than the other. It doesn't matter if its a Bush or a Clinton taking special interest money, the result is the corruption seen in Washington. It makes the public disinterested in the political process; what difference can my vote make when it's all about the power money buys. Hillary is about the most non-feminist figure I can think of. She keeps hanging on the coat tails of her former president husband, touting the “successess” of his presidency as her own. Now he has been doing some campaigning for her with lack-luster results. We’ll all be better off with her and her husband’s brand of politicing sail off into the sunset. It’s time for a new way of doing things, as in the grassroots campaign of Obama, putting little reliance on PAC’s. PAC’s are the major culprit of the present lack of activity in Washington today. One special interest is pitted against the other. Decisions being made by who can buy more influence than the other.
It doesn’t matter if its a Bush or a Clinton taking special interest money, the result is the corruption seen in Washington. It makes the public disinterested in the political process; what difference can my vote make when it’s all about the power money buys.

]]>