<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress, not Obama, needs a Geek Corps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/11/01/congress-not-obama-needs-a-geek-corps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/11/01/congress-not-obama-needs-a-geek-corps/</link>
	<description>Anderson + Koo = Anderkoo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:17:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anderkoo / Why the Senate needs a Lion now more than ever</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/11/01/congress-not-obama-needs-a-geek-corps/comment-page-1/#comment-41874</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderkoo / Why the Senate needs a Lion now more than ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=427#comment-41874</guid>
		<description>[...] written before about why Congress needs a Geek Corps, and I continue to hope that the advent of a more decentralized social media will boost the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about why Congress needs a Geek Corps, and I continue to hope that the advent of a more decentralized social media will boost the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to a Posthuman Democracy! &#171; The Posthuman Marxist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/11/01/congress-not-obama-needs-a-geek-corps/comment-page-1/#comment-36122</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to a Posthuman Democracy! &#171; The Posthuman Marxist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=427#comment-36122</guid>
		<description>[...] It is not surprising, then, to hear all the buzz about wiki governance and Google transparency. Anderkoo has an excellent take on this matter, which is worth a serious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It is not surprising, then, to hear all the buzz about wiki governance and Google transparency. Anderkoo has an excellent take on this matter, which is worth a serious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Larson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geek Corps for Congress</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/11/01/congress-not-obama-needs-a-geek-corps/comment-page-1/#comment-36064</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Larson &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geek Corps for Congress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=427#comment-36064</guid>
		<description>[...] This morning Jerimiah Owyang tallied social networking stats for the candidates showing a huge advantage to Obama. Now Gene Koo writes that Congress, not Obama, needs a Geek Corps. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This morning Jerimiah Owyang tallied social networking stats for the candidates showing a huge advantage to Obama. Now Gene Koo writes that Congress, not Obama, needs a Geek Corps. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mackenzie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/11/01/congress-not-obama-needs-a-geek-corps/comment-page-1/#comment-36062</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=427#comment-36062</guid>
		<description>I was going to point out how difficult Congress makes themselves to track since their site lacks RSS and never has information far enough in advance to really count on your snail mail reaching them in time, but a quick Google found htttp://congress.org where they *do* have that sort of information all nicely compiled.  Bonus:  you can get  lists of what Congress is debating and how your Congress-folks and Senators voted sent to your email.

So I guess someone before me noticed how much Congress was trying to fly under the radar and avoid transparency and decided to make it easy for the public to reach.  Now we just need to find a way to get that information out to the less tech-savvy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to point out how difficult Congress makes themselves to track since their site lacks RSS and never has information far enough in advance to really count on your snail mail reaching them in time, but a quick Google found&nbsp;<a href="htttp://congress.org" title="htttp://congress.org" target="_blank">htttp://congress.org</a> where they *do* have that sort of information all nicely compiled.  Bonus:  you can get  lists of what Congress is debating and how your Congress-folks and Senators voted sent to your email.</p>
<p>So I guess someone before me noticed how much Congress was trying to fly under the radar and avoid transparency and decided to make it easy for the public to reach.  Now we just need to find a way to get that information out to the less tech-savvy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Viselli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2008/11/01/congress-not-obama-needs-a-geek-corps/comment-page-1/#comment-36017</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Viselli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=427#comment-36017</guid>
		<description>Check out Tech for Obama:  http://www.techforobama.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Tech for Obama:  <a href="http://www.techforobama.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techforobama.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
