<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s non-reductive rhetoric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2009/01/21/obamas-non-reductive-rhetoric/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2009/01/21/obamas-non-reductive-rhetoric/</link>
	<description>Anderson + Koo = Anderkoo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:17:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2009/01/21/obamas-non-reductive-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-39163</link>
		<dc:creator>sy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=443#comment-39163</guid>
		<description>Stanley Fish contemplates Obama&#039;s inauguration speech: http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/barack-obamas-prose-style/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanley Fish contemplates Obama&#8217;s inauguration speech: <a href="http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/barack-obamas-prose-style/" rel="nofollow">http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/barack-obamas-prose-style/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls Weblog &#183; On inspiration</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2009/01/21/obamas-non-reductive-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-39085</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls Weblog &#183; On inspiration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=443#comment-39085</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama&#8217;s non-reductive rhetoric, Gene Koo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama&#8217;s non-reductive rhetoric, Gene Koo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThickCulture &#187; Obama&#8217;s Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2009/01/21/obamas-non-reductive-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-39049</link>
		<dc:creator>ThickCulture &#187; Obama&#8217;s Rhetoric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=443#comment-39049</guid>
		<description>[...] Koo has an interesting observation about Obama&#8217;s rhetorical style: By using complex constructions that resist distillation, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Koo has an interesting observation about Obama&#8217;s rhetorical style: By using complex constructions that resist distillation, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Koo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2009/01/21/obamas-non-reductive-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-39045</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Koo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=443#comment-39045</guid>
		<description>Maybe... though &quot;Yes we can&quot; is the chorus, and in the absence of the lyrics it would have been nothing more than a slogan; it would have lacked emotional punch. (E.g. contrast Deval Patrick&#039;s &quot;Together we can,&quot; or even Obama&#039;s use of &quot;Yes we can&quot; in his 2004 Senatorial race).

In the section excerpted by the song, Obama tells a new story of America (and largely a progressive story -- &quot;workers who organized, women who reached for the ballot...&quot;). Once you have heard that story, &quot;Yes we can&quot; does capture the concept, but without hearing (and agreeing with) that story, the phrase is meaningless. I think this is what fueled so much of the cynicism about &quot;empty rhetoric&quot; -- they heard only the slogan or disagreed with the story.

Of course, the ability to sum up the concept in a slogan is what gives that speech so much power, and why I think it&#039;s far and away the best one he&#039;s given. In that respect it&#039;s atypical for Obama. I&#039;m not saying that he SHOULDN&#039;T have more catch phrases in his speeches when they serve his purpose, but when it comes to articulating difficult and complex issues like race relations, AVOIDING sound bites, especially now that he has the bully pulpit, plays to his strengths when alternative media exist for people who want to seek out the full story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe&#8230; though &#8220;Yes we can&#8221; is the chorus, and in the absence of the lyrics it would have been nothing more than a slogan; it would have lacked emotional punch. (E.g. contrast Deval Patrick&#8217;s &#8220;Together we can,&#8221; or even Obama&#8217;s use of &#8220;Yes we can&#8221; in his 2004 Senatorial race).</p>
<p>In the section excerpted by the song, Obama tells a new story of America (and largely a progressive story &#8212; &#8220;workers who organized, women who reached for the ballot&#8230;&#8221;). Once you have heard that story, &#8220;Yes we can&#8221; does capture the concept, but without hearing (and agreeing with) that story, the phrase is meaningless. I think this is what fueled so much of the cynicism about &#8220;empty rhetoric&#8221; &#8212; they heard only the slogan or disagreed with the story.</p>
<p>Of course, the ability to sum up the concept in a slogan is what gives that speech so much power, and why I think it&#8217;s far and away the best one he&#8217;s given. In that respect it&#8217;s atypical for Obama. I&#8217;m not saying that he SHOULDN&#8217;T have more catch phrases in his speeches when they serve his purpose, but when it comes to articulating difficult and complex issues like race relations, AVOIDING sound bites, especially now that he has the bully pulpit, plays to his strengths when alternative media exist for people who want to seek out the full story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxim Weinstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2009/01/21/obamas-non-reductive-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-39044</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxim Weinstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=443#comment-39044</guid>
		<description>But couldn&#039;t you argue that the success of the will.i.am/Dylan video came in part because it reduced the core message down to the soundbite &quot;Yes We Can?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But couldn&#8217;t you argue that the success of the will.i.am/Dylan video came in part because it reduced the core message down to the soundbite &#8220;Yes We Can?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Goes Around Sound-Bit Media with Complexity &#8211; Center for Citizen Media</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/2009/01/21/obamas-non-reductive-rhetoric/comment-page-1/#comment-39043</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama Goes Around Sound-Bit Media with Complexity &#8211; Center for Citizen Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/anderkoo/?p=443#comment-39043</guid>
		<description>[...] Goes Around Sound-Bit Media with Complexity  Jan 21st, 2009 by Dan Gillmor.    Gene Koo: Obama’s non-reductive rhetoric. The technology to bypass top-down media is one cornerstone of Obama’s success as a communicator. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Goes Around Sound-Bit Media with Complexity  Jan 21st, 2009 by Dan Gillmor.    Gene Koo: Obama’s non-reductive rhetoric. The technology to bypass top-down media is one cornerstone of Obama’s success as a communicator. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
