~ Archive for May, 2006 ~

Being so caught up…

4

8b.jpg

Eve responded very interestingly that it wasn’t by any means just a prop that was put there for the photograph. It was a copy of a book that Marilyn had borrowed from a friend and was in the process of reading. But she didn’t read it sequentially, beginning at the beginning and going through to the end. She read it in episodes. She dipped into places from time to time where fancy took her to different moments in the book. It occurred to me, thinking about that, that is the way we should all read Ulysses. That is certainly something I tell my students when we begin to read Ulysses in class. I don’t want them to think of it as a chore — that you’ve got to begin on page one and read through to page six hundred and thirty-six. You can pick it up and put it down, of course, as Joyce himself picked it up and put it down as he was writing the book over a period of fifteen to sixteen years.

Hay algo irritantemente condescendiente en la existencia de esta foto, el mero hecho de que se hiciera, por genuina que fuese. Alguien añadiría a tanta condescendencia que obviamente es el pasaje en el que Molly se está corriendo… El titular, por cierto, es toda una canallada. Sí, es un post raro.

Thanks, Susannah!

Otra vez le han dado galletas después de medianoche

2

135580694_870ce3ec64.jpg

Propaganda soviética 1917-1991
Los comunistas siempre fueron los mejores en propaganda. La propaganda y el mal parecen estar inextricablemente unidos, algo que no podrían desmentir los socialistas españoles.

Dígase esto con voz ominosamente profunda y luego suéltese una carcajada como las del malo de Zoolander. A la cara amable del nacional-liberalismo patrio alguien debería explicarle que una cosa es, muy merecidamente, condenar el totalitarismo soviético y su propaganda, y otra darse al ridículo.

Tanto por ver aún

7

statemap1.gif
Create your own visited states map or check out these Google Hacks.

Y además este mapa tiene mucho de trampa: Nevada está por una parada en Las Vegas (máquinas tragaperras en la sala de espera entre puertas de embarque), Connecticut porque paso por ahí en el autobús chino hacia NY, New Jersey por haber aterrizado en Newark alguna que otra vez, Georgia por pillarnos de camino hacia Miami sin que hicieramos siquiera una parada… Más California, mucha más, más New Jersey, más Austin TX,… y el condado de Lexington Miss., claro.

Isaac, the accidental patriarch

0

This story is enthralling and troubling for several reasons. First, I don’t think I’ve ever read anything that’s so grim on the relationship of brothers as this first half of Genesis. Cain and Abel, Ham, Shem, and Japheth, Isaac and Ishmael, Esau and Jacob, and soon Joseph and his brothers. The relationship of brothers is purely antagonistic: They battle for inheritance, for God’s love, for their father’s respect. They conspire against each other, narc on each other, murder each other. There’s not a single act of love or kindness between brothers so far. Brothers are only enemies. Was nomadic life so difficult that only one son in any family could hope to prosper? And if brothers are bad, women are worse. The blessing story is a reminder of just how uncharitable the Bible is toward women, who have so far been either invisible, foolish, or vindictive. Think about the women so far: Eve, suckered by the serpent. Noah’s wife doesn’t even get a name. Sarah is tricky (pretends to be Abraham’s sister), capricious (sends Hagar to Abraham, then rages about it), and cruel (exiles Hagar and Ishmael). Lot’s wife dies because she can’t refrain from looking back. Lot’s daughters rape him. And Rebekah hoodwinks her husband and punishes her older son. I suppose you could argue that Rebekah, with her icy Machiavellian cunning, is a woman to be proud of. She seizes power from her husband and dominates her sons. She controls every scene she’s in. She’s vivid, if not good.

Her fierce intelligence raises another point about the story. God doesn’t suffer fools gladly. It’s clear that Esau’s chief failing is that he’s dumb. He loses his birthright because he’s impatient for lunch, and loses his blessing because he’s not smart enough to recognize that Jacob might steal it. Jacob and Rebekah, for all their faults, are smart. Abraham, Rebekah, and Jacob—the three great brains of Genesis so far—get what they want—and earn God’s blessing—because they finagle, cajole, argue, deceive, play mind games, and even use God to advance their lies. And the Lord seems to love it.

David Plotz sigue blogueando sobre la Biblia. Uds. me perdonen esta pequeña obsesión que me acompaña desde los seis años.

Web 2.0: Another Manifesto

8

77845515_a0b6c33790.jpg

Si es que nada puede haber más en la línea de este gran esfuerzo colaborativo, interactivo, de inteligencia distribuida, de inteligente distribución de información en la que la información y el valor interactúan en el mismo proceso colaborador de la conversación,  constituyéndolo, que el que un tipo tenga su Flickr lleno de bellezas orientales. No se me pierdan.

Why Architecture is the only art we still fight about

4

21cover.386.jpg

El NY Times le dedica todo su suplemento dominical a por qué la arquitectura es el único arte que es todavia relevante. Lo que no entiendo es por qué han ido a escoger para la portada un ejemplo de arquitectura sin ningún impacto urbanístico. Una casa blanca y aislada en un paraje árido con un par de árboles, es decir, un hoyo de anacoreta, un estoico beatus ille revivido, una choza homérica… O tal vez es que este es, hasta cierto punto, el ideal de ciertos arquitectos con vocación de Baron de Hausmann o Norman Foster pero sin un dictador (Napoleón III, el PC chino) detrás. Ya que la sociedad no me deja intervenir en el tejido urbano como a mí me da la gana, me voy a edificar lo que me salga de la polla (o el chocho) en los Monegros. Que ahora los arquitectos que me leen me corten la cabeza por esta caricatura.

Northern California magic

0

Puro Lynch

0

IMG_0473-1.jpgLas Pinups de Viva Van, cortesía de Otomano. De repente tengo ganas de ver Corazón salvaje, los primeros cinco episodios de Twin Peaks

The Sopranos, which many, myself included, consider the greatest television drama ever made

2

Most shows broadcast their first eight episodes and then take a break. A successful show will at this point often recalibrate itself, responding rapidly to satisfy audience expectations or, these days, to confound them. When The OC returned for its ninth episode after its first hiatus, it had wittily incorporated all the jokes that fans were already making about the show: Benjamin McKenzie’s resemblance to a puppy-dog Russell Crowe was duly noted, and jokes about Peter Gallagher’s eyebrows were 10 a penny. South Park proved itself even more fleet of foot, killing off Isaac Hayes’s character Chef less than a week after Hayes himself quit in protest at the show’s treatment of Scientology (they tore him limb from limb and did everything short of boiling his bones). Try doing that with a movie.

On TV, writing by committee is a blessing, the secret of US TV’s present greatness, whereas at the movies one groans inwardly when a movie has six or more writing credits. Movie writers work at home with a script originated by someone they’ve never met. A director may then take a shot at rewriting, and the star will bring on even more scribes to tailor the material to his or her on-screen persona. The result, often, is a dog’s dinner of a script, and a dog of a movie, because there is no single governing intelligence to hold everything together. TV writers, perhaps 10 or more on some shows, work together with a supreme guiding force - usually the show’s creator - working up story arcs, character profiles and so on, before handing individual episodes to one or two writers. Their work is then tweaked in committee. Somehow, it works.

And the person who benefits is the viewer. As CBS-Paramount TV president David Stapf said recently, “TV is as good as it gets because the form forces the writers to be better. You don’t have time to meander. So writers hone their craft on 22 little movies a year.”

Tan largo este artículo sobre por qué las series de televisión estadounidenses son infinitamente mejores y más interesantes que el cine contemporáneo de los EE.UU. que apenas lo he leído en diagonal. Pero, la verdad, cuánta gente inteligente, culta, élite de la “ciudad letrada” en suma, está enganchada a The Sopranos, Six Feet Under, Lost, etc. Nunca visto. E imposible de lograr estar al día, cinco temporadas de Six Feet para este verano. Todo se acumula y uno siente esa vergüenza familiar ante las propias lagunas literarias. Mientras tanto, no he ido al cine a ver una peli nueva desde seguramente hace más de un año. Y si me las he bajado de eMule no las he visto, esa urgencia falta.

Ciudades de hojalata

2

ZhanWang,_UrbanLandscape-Lo.jpg

We also liked Zhan Wang’s aerial-view photograph of a central London constructed entirely of gleaming aluminium kitchenware. There’s a pots and pans St. Paul’s, a colander and cheese grater Parliament, a catering tray Embankment and, no doubt, a good-enough-to-eat-off Saatchi gallery tucked in there somewhere. It’s a polished and presented London, stripped of all history and replicated for our amusement.

Things Mag enlaza a esta cosa gafipasta allá en Pekín. Yo me vuelvo con ese coñazo que es la Eneida, tan plasta como todas esas bandas de niñatos ingleses copiando todos y cada uno de los tics de los ochenta. Arte de empollones sin arte.

Log in
Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress