Pónganle titular a este post

485424374_51dca33354.jpg

Valdano explained why Benítez and Mourinho were to blame for the demise of flair and creativity. “The lives of Mourinho and Benítez have crossed in a world that is ever more scrutinised and exposed by the media, which is why they look at each other with such distrust,” he wrote, “but they have two things in common: a previously denied, hitherto unsatisfied hunger for glory, and a desire to have everything under control.

“Both of those things stem from one key factor: neither Mourinho nor Benítez made it as a player. That has made them channel all their vanity into coaching. Those who did not have the talent to make it as players do not believe in the talent of players, they do not believe in the ability to improvise in order to win football matches. In short, Benítez and Mourinho are exactly the kind of coaches that Benítez and Mourinho would have needed to have made it as players.”

Portada manipulada (¿al cuadrado? ¿al cubo?) por Rinzewind; artículo apuntado (una vez más) por pezhammer; intención y acto de mezclar churras con merinas, speed & bacon, el culo con las témporas, responsabilidad de este pobre y humilde servidor…

2 Comments »

  1. wise

    May 9, 2007 @ 10:24 am

    1

    Jopetas no se me ocurre nada…

    Mundo raro

  2. Carlos Arrikitown

    May 9, 2007 @ 12:57 pm

    2

    La naturaleza del crítico, una visión futbolística…
    No hay poder sin fustración.

Leave a Comment

Log in
Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress