<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When One Extreme Helps Another</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ben/2004/07/21/when-one-extreme-helps-another/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ben/2004/07/21/when-one-extreme-helps-another/</link>
	<description>crypto and public policy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Swartz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ben/2004/07/21/when-one-extreme-helps-another/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Swartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/benadida/2004/07/21/when-one-extreme-helps-another/#comment-400</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Is all that stuff about the French true? I assumed it was just the usual conservative propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Is all that stuff about the French true? I assumed it was just the usual conservative propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Adida</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ben/2004/07/21/when-one-extreme-helps-another/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Adida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 20:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/benadida/2004/07/21/when-one-extreme-helps-another/#comment-399</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Greggy, you're right that the neocons would not have seen the light of day, and I certainly don't claim that in my post. However, the other people involved, say the more moderate Republicans, might have seen an option to be more reasonable without losing face.

And certainly, I'm not claiming that the French are responsible for Wolfowitz and co. I'm only saying that, if the French's goal was to  truly prevent war, they might have had a better card to play. But you're right, not playing that card doesn't constitute responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Greggy, you&#8217;re right that the neocons would not have seen the light of day, and I certainly don&#8217;t claim that in my post. However, the other people involved, say the more moderate Republicans, might have seen an option to be more reasonable without losing face.</p>
<p>And certainly, I&#8217;m not claiming that the French are responsible for Wolfowitz and co. I&#8217;m only saying that, if the French&#8217;s goal was to  truly prevent war, they might have had a better card to play. But you&#8217;re right, not playing that card doesn&#8217;t constitute responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greggy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/ben/2004/07/21/when-one-extreme-helps-another/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>greggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/benadida/2004/07/21/when-one-extreme-helps-another/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

"But maybe a more objective stance from France might have tempered the neocon extreme."

Not in a million years.  This suggestion ignores a mountain of evidence that the neocons could never have been stopped by rational or objective analysis.  The froggies may not be angels, but they sure as shit are not even secondarily responsible for the mad fantasies of Perle, Wolfowitz, &#38; Co. from seeing the light of day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>&#8220;But maybe a more objective stance from France might have tempered the neocon extreme.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not in a million years.  This suggestion ignores a mountain of evidence that the neocons could never have been stopped by rational or objective analysis.  The froggies may not be angels, but they sure as shit are not even secondarily responsible for the mad fantasies of Perle, Wolfowitz, &amp; Co. from seeing the light of day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
