Starting with some discussions at Crypto 2004, a few of us cryptographers discussed setting up new standards for evaluating voting systems.
We were specifically worried about the design-oriented, pass/fail nature of current standards. Instead, we want performance-oriented, multi-dimensional tests. Basically, instead of saying “machine X is good for voting because it uses DES encryption,” a fairly useless statement, we want a testing authority to say “machine X receives a 7.6 score on confidentiality and a 3.5 score on usability because 95% of users maintained voter secrecy and 40% of users were able to express their vote correctly.”
No Comments »
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>