<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Data Sharing vs. Privacy: Cutting the Gordian Knot (Re-Identification Symposium)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/data-sharing-vs-privacy-cutting-the-gordian-knot-re-identification-symposium/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/data-sharing-vs-privacy-cutting-the-gordian-knot-re-identification-symposium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meyer Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Subjects Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re-Identification Symposium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is part of Bill of Health‘s symposium on the Law, Ethics, and Science and Re-Identification Demonstrations. You can call up all of the symposium contributions here. Please note that Bill of Health continues to have problems receiving some &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/data-sharing-vs-privacy-cutting-the-gordian-knot-re-identification-symposium/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/data-sharing-vs-privacy-cutting-the-gordian-knot-re-identification-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking Good: A Short Ethical Manifesto for the Privacy Researcher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/breaking-good-a-short-ethical-manifesto-for-the-privacy-researcher/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/breaking-good-a-short-ethical-manifesto-for-the-privacy-researcher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meyer Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Subjects Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re-Identification Symposium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is part of Bill of Health‘s symposium on the Law, Ethics, and Science and Re-Identification Demonstrations. We’ll have more contributions throughout the week, and extending at least into early next week. Background on the symposium is here. You &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/breaking-good-a-short-ethical-manifesto-for-the-privacy-researcher/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/breaking-good-a-short-ethical-manifesto-for-the-privacy-researcher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liability for Failure to Vaccinate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/liability-for-failure-to-vaccinate/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/liability-for-failure-to-vaccinate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>acaplan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arthur Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Law Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal responsibility for health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population-Level Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Art Caplan Measles are breaking out all over Britain.  Getting fewer headlines is the fact that measles are back in the USA too.  In fact they are in our region.  A mini-epidemic is raging in Brooklyn.  Measles for cripes &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/liability-for-failure-to-vaccinate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/23/liability-for-failure-to-vaccinate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-Identification Is Not the Problem. The Delusion of De-Identification Is. (Re-Identification Symposium)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/22/re-identification-is-not-the-problem-the-delusion-of-de-identification-is-re-identification-symposium/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/22/re-identification-is-not-the-problem-the-delusion-of-de-identification-is-re-identification-symposium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meyer Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Subjects Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re-Identification Symposium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second post in Bill of Health‘s symposium on the Law, Ethics, and Science and Re-Identification Demonstrations. We’ll have more contributions throughout the week, and extending at least into early next week. Background on the symposium is here. &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/22/re-identification-is-not-the-problem-the-delusion-of-de-identification-is-re-identification-symposium/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/22/re-identification-is-not-the-problem-the-delusion-of-de-identification-is-re-identification-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>9th Circuit Strikes Down Arizona 20 Week Fetal Pain Abortion Ban: Some Reflections on the Opinion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/22/9th-circuit-strikes-down-arizona-20-week-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-some-reflections-on-the-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/22/9th-circuit-strikes-down-arizona-20-week-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-some-reflections-on-the-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>glenncohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I. Glenn Cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Cross-Posted at Prawsfblawg] Yesterday, the 9th Circuit (a panel of Berzon, Schroeder, Kleinfeld) struck down as unconstitutional Arizona&#8217;s ban on abortion at 20 weeks. As the court described the statute: The challenged portion of Section 7, codified at Arizona Revised &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/22/9th-circuit-strikes-down-arizona-20-week-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-some-reflections-on-the-opinion/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/22/9th-circuit-strikes-down-arizona-20-week-fetal-pain-abortion-ban-some-reflections-on-the-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sperm Donation, Anonymity, and Compensation: An Empirical Legal Study</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/sperm-donation-anonymity-and-compensation-an-empirical-legal-study/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/sperm-donation-anonymity-and-compensation-an-empirical-legal-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>glenncohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Tissue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I. Glenn Cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Cross-Posted at Prawfsblawg] In the United States, most sperm donations* are anonymous. By contrast, many developed nations require sperm donors to be identified, typically requiring new sperm (and egg) donors to put identifying information into a registry that is made &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/sperm-donation-anonymity-and-compensation-an-empirical-legal-study/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/sperm-donation-anonymity-and-compensation-an-empirical-legal-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Applying Information Privacy Norms to Re-Identification Demonstrations (Re-Identification Symposium)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/applying-information-privacy-norms-to-re-identification-demonstrations-re-identification-symposium/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/applying-information-privacy-norms-to-re-identification-demonstrations-re-identification-symposium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meyer Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Information Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Subjects Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Re-Identification Symposium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first post in Bill of Health&#8216;s symposium on the Law, Ethics, and Science and Re-Identification Demonstrations. We&#8217;ll have more contributions throughout the week. Background on the symposium is here. You can call up all of the symposium &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/applying-information-privacy-norms-to-re-identification-demonstrations-re-identification-symposium/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/applying-information-privacy-norms-to-re-identification-demonstrations-re-identification-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caplan: Stop Critiquing the DSM 5</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/caplan-stop-critiquing-the-dsm-5/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/caplan-stop-critiquing-the-dsm-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>petrieflom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arthur Caplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art Caplan has a new column out in Time that takes a different stance on the DSM-V, compared to all the criticism the revisions have recently received: The critics are going way too far. The DSM is often described as &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/caplan-stop-critiquing-the-dsm-5/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/21/caplan-stop-critiquing-the-dsm-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics and Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/20/politics-and-science/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/20/politics-and-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanna Sax</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Empirical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Law Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joanna Sax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Cells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Joanna Sax On April 29, Scott Burris blogged about a new bill that would allow Congress to set the scientific agenda, which would replace the traditional peer review process.  I echo his expressed concerns, but want to add more.  &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/20/politics-and-science/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/20/politics-and-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex, People with Disabilities, Prostitution, and Universal Health Care: Reflections on &#8220;The Sessions&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/20/sex-people-with-disabilities-prostitution-and-universal-health-care-reflections-on-the-sessions/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/20/sex-people-with-disabilities-prostitution-and-universal-health-care-reflections-on-the-sessions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>glenncohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Law Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I. Glenn Cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/?p=6169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Cross-Posted at PrawfsBlawg] One of my favorite initiatives at Harvard Law School, where I teach, is that faculty members get to offer an optional 10-12 student not-for-credit &#8220;First-Year Reading Groups&#8221; on a topic of interest to them that is related &#8230; <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/20/sex-people-with-disabilities-prostitution-and-universal-health-care-reflections-on-the-sessions/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/05/20/sex-people-with-disabilities-prostitution-and-universal-health-care-reflections-on-the-sessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
