<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTunes and Webcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/05/14/itunes-and-webcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/05/14/itunes-and-webcasting/</link>
	<description>by Derek Slater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:07:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/05/14/itunes-and-webcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-4365</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2003 02:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/05/14/itunes-and-webcasting/#comment-4365</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also don&#039;t think there&#039;s much bad about what Apple is doing here.  I also think it&#039;s kind of different from webcasting.  It&#039;s almost like being able to put up a read only collection of your songs on your web page. There&#039;s no real broadcasting going on, it&#039;s more web-like in that sense.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was interesting chatting about this tonight at the blog thing.  I wish I had net while there, because I could have shown how it works on my laptop.  I hope nothing comes of this because I love it. I love being able to share out my playlist and listen to it from wherever I happen to be (though I password protect it. I don&#039;t want random people using up my bandwidth).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much bad about what Apple is doing here.  I also think it&#8217;s kind of different from webcasting.  It&#8217;s almost like being able to put up a read only collection of your songs on your web page. There&#8217;s no real broadcasting going on, it&#8217;s more web-like in that sense.</p>
<p>It was interesting chatting about this tonight at the blog thing.  I wish I had net while there, because I could have shown how it works on my laptop.  I hope nothing comes of this because I love it. I love being able to share out my playlist and listen to it from wherever I happen to be (though I password protect it. I don&#8217;t want random people using up my bandwidth).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Robb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/05/14/itunes-and-webcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-4364</link>
		<dc:creator>John Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 22:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/05/14/itunes-and-webcasting/#comment-4364</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I agree in the short term.  Webcasting is expensive to provide.  I can&#039;t see many people allowing too many people to stream off of their desktops/servers before they cry &quot;uncle&quot;

Of course, in the long term, PCs are 1000 times more powerful and bandwidth is 1/1000 as expensive and that equation will change.  Everyone becomes a microRadio station in that world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I agree in the short term.  Webcasting is expensive to provide.  I can&#8217;t see many people allowing too many people to stream off of their desktops/servers before they cry &#8220;uncle&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, in the long term, PCs are 1000 times more powerful and bandwidth is 1/1000 as expensive and that equation will change.  Everyone becomes a microRadio station in that world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
