<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Because Fingerprinting Worked So Well The First Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/01/28/because-fingerprinting-worked-so-well-the-first-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/01/28/because-fingerprinting-worked-so-well-the-first-time/</link>
	<description>by Derek Slater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:07:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/01/28/because-fingerprinting-worked-so-well-the-first-time/comment-page-1/#comment-4519</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/01/28/because-fingerprinting-worked-so-wel#comment-4519</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Fingerprinting obviously has to be beneficial to creator and user alike, otherwise the content will be ripped and the fingerprint &#039;filed off&#039;. Fingerprinting is central to an ACS, it&#039;s a way to find the desired content, it&#039;s a way to get the artist compensated. All the best to those that wish to create a fingerprint/watermark, but they should remember all parties need sufficient incentive to leave it intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Fingerprinting obviously has to be beneficial to creator and user alike, otherwise the content will be ripped and the fingerprint &#8216;filed off&#8217;. Fingerprinting is central to an ACS, it&#8217;s a way to find the desired content, it&#8217;s a way to get the artist compensated. All the best to those that wish to create a fingerprint/watermark, but they should remember all parties need sufficient incentive to leave it intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/01/28/because-fingerprinting-worked-so-well-the-first-time/comment-page-1/#comment-4518</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/01/28/because-fingerprinting-worked-so-wel#comment-4518</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Fingerprinting obviously has to be beneficial to creator and user alike, otherwise the content will be ripped and the fingerprint &#039;filed off&#039;. Fingerprinting is central to an ACS, it&#039;s a way to find the desired content, it&#039;s a way to get the artist compensated. All the best to those that wish to create a fingerprint/watermark, but they should remember all parties need sufficient incentive to leave it intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Fingerprinting obviously has to be beneficial to creator and user alike, otherwise the content will be ripped and the fingerprint &#8216;filed off&#8217;. Fingerprinting is central to an ACS, it&#8217;s a way to find the desired content, it&#8217;s a way to get the artist compensated. All the best to those that wish to create a fingerprint/watermark, but they should remember all parties need sufficient incentive to leave it intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
