<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spin on Audible Magic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/03/03/spin-on-audible-magic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/03/03/spin-on-audible-magic/</link>
	<description>by Derek Slater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:07:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AdamThomas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/03/03/spin-on-audible-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-4528</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamThomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2004/03/03/spin-on-audible-magic/#comment-4528</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

After checking out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.replicheck.com/how_it_works.html&quot;&gt; how RepliCheck works&lt;/a&gt;, I see no protection of anonymity. Rather, if the copyright report is sent to the P2P user, there&#039;s no reason it couldn&#039;t be logged, thereby giving Audible Magic a perfect (well, with 98% accuracy) list of all &quot;Registered&quot; media. 

Which brings about a second question, how transparent is this list of 3.4 million songs and 10,000 software titles (later quoted as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.audiblemagic.com/song_registration.html&quot;&gt;3.7 million&lt;/a&gt; - not that transparent)? Presumably, Audible Magic will be used to disable sharing of positively &#039;fingerprinted&#039; files. Will audio snippets be registered, thereby blocking fair use? Could Diebold have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.audiblemagic.com/song_registration.html&quot;&gt;&quot;registered&quot;&lt;/a&gt; their memos, quashing their distribution? There&#039;s no mention of the process.

Last, with perfect monitoring of webcasting chart play, jockeys get can ready for pay-per-play fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>After checking out <a href="http://www.replicheck.com/how_it_works.html"> how RepliCheck works</a>, I see no protection of anonymity. Rather, if the copyright report is sent to the P2P user, there&#8217;s no reason it couldn&#8217;t be logged, thereby giving Audible Magic a perfect (well, with 98% accuracy) list of all &#8220;Registered&#8221; media. </p>
<p>Which brings about a second question, how transparent is this list of 3.4 million songs and 10,000 software titles (later quoted as <a href="http://www.audiblemagic.com/song_registration.html">3.7 million</a> &#8211; not that transparent)? Presumably, Audible Magic will be used to disable sharing of positively &#8216;fingerprinted&#8217; files. Will audio snippets be registered, thereby blocking fair use? Could Diebold have <a href="http://www.audiblemagic.com/song_registration.html">&#8220;registered&#8221;</a> their memos, quashing their distribution? There&#8217;s no mention of the process.</p>
<p>Last, with perfect monitoring of webcasting chart play, jockeys get can ready for pay-per-play fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
