Napster Players Can’t Play Napster Songs

Frank points to a couple articles about Napster deciding to give away Rio Chiba portable players to users who sign up for one year subscriptions.  What’s funny is that the Chibas can’t play music that a subscriber downloads; you have to buy the song for a dollar in order to move it to a portable device.  Unless you can upgrade the firmware (which is quite possible), you won’t be able to even transfer the songs when Janus rolls out.  So this isn’t just a means to draw people to the Napster service, but to get them to pay for permanent downloads.


Note that this strategy is in part a result of the iTunes-iPod tie or more generally the DRM+DMCA lock-in factor.  Companies can’t easily compete in the store and player markets independently.  If you have a player that can’t interoperate with store’s songs, your product is worthless. Similarly, if your store sells songs that aren’t supported by the most popular hardware, your songs are worthless.  Thus, lack of interoperability creates barriers to entry in both markets.


For more, see the now white paper edition of the Berkman Center iTunes Case Study.

Inducing You To Visit Other Blogs

As is probably apparent, I haven’t had enough time to link to all the great posts out there.  Please visit everyone on the blogroll, esp. Frank and Copyfight.  The big news of the last 24 hours has been the INDUCE Act.  I wonder how much of this blog is an illegal inducement under the Act. Sigh.


In any case, here are a couple of links to get you started: Copyfight, Frank, SethF, Ed Felten.


Also, see my earlier article called, “Protecting Sony and the Internet: A Discussion and Critique of Imposing Harsher Secondary Copyright Infringement Rules to Inhibit Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing.”  Therein, I criticize a negligence approach to secondary liability, which doesn’t even come close to the harm that this inducement standard would do.

Protected by AkismetBlog with WordPress