<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OMG Licensed P2P!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/07/30/omg-licensed-p2p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/07/30/omg-licensed-p2p/</link>
	<description>by Derek Slater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:07:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Bovens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/07/30/omg-licensed-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-4780</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Bovens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/07/30/omg-licensed-p2p/#comment-4780</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

Gotcha ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>Gotcha <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Slater</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/07/30/omg-licensed-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-4779</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 07:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/07/30/omg-licensed-p2p/#comment-4779</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I agree. My tone was sarcastic ... at least that was the intention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I agree. My tone was sarcastic &#8230; at least that was the intention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Bovens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/07/30/omg-licensed-p2p/comment-page-1/#comment-4778</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Bovens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/07/30/omg-licensed-p2p/#comment-4778</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I must say I&#039;m not convinced this is a first step in the direction of licensed P2P. Look for instance at what happened with iMesh, which is also touted as a legit &quot;P2P&quot; service, while in fact it is a subscription service/music store with some filtered P2P freebies.
In the end, I think the big labels are only interested in P2P as a way to limit bandwidth costs (cfr. the recent Bittorrent/movie studios deals) - embracing P2P as a new distribution model would be way too threatening for their hit-focused business models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<p>I must say I&#8217;m not convinced this is a first step in the direction of licensed P2P. Look for instance at what happened with iMesh, which is also touted as a legit &#8220;P2P&#8221; service, while in fact it is a subscription service/music store with some filtered P2P freebies.<br />
In the end, I think the big labels are only interested in P2P as a way to limit bandwidth costs (cfr. the recent Bittorrent/movie studios deals) &#8211; embracing P2P as a new distribution model would be way too threatening for their hit-focused business models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
