<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve Jobs: DRM Is Bad for Consumers, Innovators, *and* Artists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-innovators-and-artists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-innovators-and-artists/</link>
	<description>by Derek Slater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:07:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Knoxville Tennessee Blog &#187; University of Tennessee Students VS RIAA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-innovators-and-artists/comment-page-1/#comment-8655</link>
		<dc:creator>Knoxville Tennessee Blog &#187; University of Tennessee Students VS RIAA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-#comment-8655</guid>
		<description>[...] The reality is that suing individuals does not fix the problem. There are an abundance of anonymous ways to transfer music across the Internet. Consider Filetopia, an old but slick software package that offers anonymous file transfer and servers that are overseas outside of US jurisdiction. If the RIAA is serious about curbing the p2p file transfer scene (which I am doubtful is even possible) they need to find ways to encourage people to buy music ligitimately rather than trying to discourage them through lawsuits. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The reality is that suing individuals does not fix the problem. There are an abundance of anonymous ways to transfer music across the Internet. Consider Filetopia, an old but slick software package that offers anonymous file transfer and servers that are overseas outside of US jurisdiction. If the RIAA is serious about curbing the p2p file transfer scene (which I am doubtful is even possible) they need to find ways to encourage people to buy music ligitimately rather than trying to discourage them through lawsuits. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reinventing The New Music Experience at Matt MacQueen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-innovators-and-artists/comment-page-1/#comment-7983</link>
		<dc:creator>Reinventing The New Music Experience at Matt MacQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-#comment-7983</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m with the glass half full philosophy, if the can get rid of the DRM user experience nighmares and think about &#8220;mobile music sharing&#8221; as a way to sell more (using new peer to peer revenue models of LEGITIMATE distibution) rather just perceiving all music sharing is privacy. Users share music with likeminded friends (and even strangers), that&#8217;s now a universal truth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m with the glass half full philosophy, if the can get rid of the DRM user experience nighmares and think about &#8220;mobile music sharing&#8221; as a way to sell more (using new peer to peer revenue models of LEGITIMATE distibution) rather just perceiving all music sharing is privacy. Users share music with likeminded friends (and even strangers), that&#8217;s now a universal truth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forex Advice</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-innovators-and-artists/comment-page-1/#comment-7500</link>
		<dc:creator>Forex Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-#comment-7500</guid>
		<description>EFF has been making the same exact points for several years now... I disagree with that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EFF has been making the same exact points for several years now&#8230; I disagree with that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-innovators-and-artists/comment-page-1/#comment-7476</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2007/02/06/steve-jobs-drm-is-bad-for-consumers-#comment-7476</guid>
		<description>First of three posts from &quot;DVD Jon&quot; calling BS:
http://nanocrew.net/2007/02/06/steves-thoughts-on-music/

Just &#039;cause Steve&#039;s saying what you want to hear doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s on your side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of three posts from &#8220;DVD Jon&#8221; calling BS:<br />
<a href="http://nanocrew.net/2007/02/06/steves-thoughts-on-music/" rel="nofollow">http://nanocrew.net/2007/02/06/steves-thoughts-on-music/</a></p>
<p>Just &#8217;cause Steve&#8217;s saying what you want to hear doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s on your side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
