<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
>

<channel>
	<title>A Copyfighter's Musings &#187; Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/category/notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings</link>
	<description>by Derek Slater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
		<item>
		<title>Notes from Harvard JOLT Copyright and Fair Use Symposium</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/03/15/notes-from-harvard-jolt-copyright-and-fair-use-symposium/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/03/15/notes-from-harvard-jolt-copyright-and-fair-use-symposium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/03/15/notes-from-harvard-jolt-copyright-an</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Just got back from the Harvard JOLT Copyright and Fair Use Symposium.&#160;&#160;I&#8217;ve posted notes here:
Panel 1
Boucher Keynote&#160;(to be honest, he didn&#8217;t say anything that revolutionary, so my notes aren&#8217;t that great)
Panel 2&#160;(also, less detailed notes here than for panel 1, because I had to step out for a bit and I missed a couple of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a79'></a></p>
<p><P>Just got back from the <A href="http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/p.cgi/symposium/main2003.html">Harvard JOLT Copyright and Fair Use Symposium</A>.&nbsp;&nbsp;I&#8217;ve posted notes here:</P><br />
<P><A href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/stories/storyReader$76">Panel 1</A></P><br />
<P><A href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/stories/storyReader$77">Boucher Keynote</A>&nbsp;(to be honest, he didn&#8217;t say anything that revolutionary, so my notes aren&#8217;t that great)</P><br />
<P><A href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/stories/storyReader$78">Panel 2</A>&nbsp;(also, less detailed notes here than for panel 1, because I had to step out for a bit and I missed a couple of things. But still got most of the important points)</P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/03/15/notes-from-harvard-jolt-copyright-and-fair-use-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Evidence that People Still Don&#8217;t Get Creative Commons</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/02/19/more-evidence-that-people-still-dont-get-creative-commons/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/02/19/more-evidence-that-people-still-dont-get-creative-commons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 03:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Derek Slater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/02/19/more-evidence-that-people-still-dont</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Scientific American has a brief article on the adventures of Lessig and CC. The first sentence of the concluding paragraph states, &#8220;Some legal pundits will question whether an idea that downplays the profit motive will ever be widely embraced.&#8221;
First, economic pundits would probably have more of a problem with it.
Second, CC does not completely downplay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name='a32'></a></p>
<p><P>Scientific American has a brief <A href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?colID=7&amp;articleID=000C2691-4F88-1E40-89E0809EC588EEDF">article </A>on the adventures of <A href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/">Lessig</A> and <A href="http://creativecommons.org">CC</A>. The first sentence of the concluding paragraph states, &#8220;Some legal pundits will question whether an idea that downplays the profit motive will ever be widely embraced.&#8221;</P><br />
<P>First, economic pundits would probably have more of a problem with it.</P><br />
<P>Second, CC does not completely downplay the profit motive.&nbsp; People can actually stand to profit a great deal by allowing less restrictive terms.&nbsp; </P><br />
<P>For instance,&nbsp;a photographer could circulate a few photos on the Net with links to his website included. At his website, he could then sell other photos.&nbsp; Hurray for promotional marketing!</P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2003/02/19/more-evidence-that-people-still-dont-get-creative-commons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
