<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Nacchio and SOX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/04/25/joe-nacchio-and-sox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/04/25/joe-nacchio-and-sox/</link>
	<description>Sponsored by the HLS Corporate Governance Program</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/04/25/joe-nacchio-and-sox/#comment-2989</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/04/25/joe-nacchio-and-sox/#comment-2989</guid>
		<description>Well written... SOX saves !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written&#8230; SOX saves !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Foley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/04/25/joe-nacchio-and-sox/#comment-2941</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 08:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/04/25/joe-nacchio-and-sox/#comment-2941</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, other factors may have had unseen influence on the decisions at Qwest eg, how Qwest came into existence when the original assets may have been questionably separated from the Souther Pacific.  Secondly, in the transaction by which Qwest accquired its 34,000 miles of railroad right-of-way from the Union Pacific--perhaps another unseverable asset going back to laws dating from the 19th century.  Was Nacchio so tunnel sighted about the Golden Rule and its effect on Naccio, or was he focused on the effect on the one who held the gold and made the rules?  Wasn't any possible loss to Naccio minuscule when compared to the loss to the major shareholder &#38; was that major block of Qwest shares unencumbered?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, other factors may have had unseen influence on the decisions at Qwest eg, how Qwest came into existence when the original assets may have been questionably separated from the Souther Pacific.  Secondly, in the transaction by which Qwest accquired its 34,000 miles of railroad right-of-way from the Union Pacific&#8211;perhaps another unseverable asset going back to laws dating from the 19th century.  Was Nacchio so tunnel sighted about the Golden Rule and its effect on Naccio, or was he focused on the effect on the one who held the gold and made the rules?  Wasn&#8217;t any possible loss to Naccio minuscule when compared to the loss to the major shareholder &amp; was that major block of Qwest shares unencumbered?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
