<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Transactional Legal Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/03/10/the-future-of-transactional-legal-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/03/10/the-future-of-transactional-legal-practice/</link>
	<description>Sponsored by the HLS Corporate Governance Program</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/03/10/the-future-of-transactional-legal-practice/#comment-17687</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/03/10/the-future-of-transactional-legal-pra#comment-17687</guid>
		<description>Refreshing to see somebody contributing definite ideas to the debate over how the law firm business model should be updated.

Here's another idea: why not bundle transactional services with D&#38;O insurance?

http://brokensymmetry.typepad.com/broken_symmetry/2008/01/can-the-law-fir.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refreshing to see somebody contributing definite ideas to the debate over how the law firm business model should be updated.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another idea: why not bundle transactional services with D&amp;O insurance?</p>
<p><a href="http://brokensymmetry.typepad.com/broken_symmetry/2008/01/can-the-law-fir.html" rel="nofollow">http://brokensymmetry.typepad.com/broken_symmetry/2008/01/can-the-law-fir.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
