<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shareholder Activism and the &#8220;Eclipse of the Public Corporation&#8221;: Response to Marty Lipton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/07/10/shareholder-activism-and-the-eclipse-of-the-public-corporation-response-to-marty-lipton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/07/10/shareholder-activism-and-the-eclipse-of-the-public-corporation-response-to-marty-lipton/</link>
	<description>Sponsored by the HLS Corporate Governance Program</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:31:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max Kennerly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/07/10/shareholder-activism-and-the-eclipse-of-the-public-corporation-response-to-marty-lipton/comment-page-1/#comment-19840</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Kennerly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/07/10/shareholder-activism-and-the-eclipse-of-the-public-corporation-response-to-marty-lipton/#comment-19840</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s similar to what I wrote in response to Lipton&#039;s post. My conclusion was:

&quot;So what&#039;s next? I think the information revolution will continue its course. Just as it is now possible to quickly do a wholesale accounting and review of a massive international corporation, it is also possible -- or at least soon will be possible -- for investors to keep close tabs on private corporations, even without the benefits of the openness and the economies of scale that come with public trading.

I thus foresee over the next few years growth in mid-size and large private corporations where the investors have extensive access to the records in real-time; perhaps not the same level as in a small private company, but far more than investors and public companies now have. We&#039;ve already started to see that trend with the recent explosion of private equity groups like Blackstone.&quot;

See the link to my website for more.

I still think, though, that it will be hard to stop the exodus to private equity, where investors generally have more control and information, and more accessible channels for getting both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s similar to what I wrote in response to Lipton&#8217;s post. My conclusion was:</p>
<p>&#8220;So what&#8217;s next? I think the information revolution will continue its course. Just as it is now possible to quickly do a wholesale accounting and review of a massive international corporation, it is also possible &#8212; or at least soon will be possible &#8212; for investors to keep close tabs on private corporations, even without the benefits of the openness and the economies of scale that come with public trading.</p>
<p>I thus foresee over the next few years growth in mid-size and large private corporations where the investors have extensive access to the records in real-time; perhaps not the same level as in a small private company, but far more than investors and public companies now have. We&#8217;ve already started to see that trend with the recent explosion of private equity groups like Blackstone.&#8221;</p>
<p>See the link to my website for more.</p>
<p>I still think, though, that it will be hard to stop the exodus to private equity, where investors generally have more control and information, and more accessible channels for getting both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
