CEO Ownership and External Governance

Posted by E. Han Kim, University of Michigan, Ross School of Business, on Monday September 6, 2010 at 10:53 am
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
Editor’s Note: E. Han Kim is the Fred M. Taylor Professor of Finance and Director of Mitsui Financial Research Center at the University of Michigan.

In the paper, CEO Ownership and External Governance, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, my co-author, Yao Lu, and I demonstrate that studying only one part of the governance system, in isolation from other governance mechanisms in place, may lead to inaccurate conclusions. Because there are multiple governance mechanisms at work, both internally and externally, understanding of corporate governance requires analysis on how various governance mechanisms interact in affecting agency problems and firm performance, and the channels through which the interactive effects take place. In this paper, we make that attempt by examining how CEO share ownership and the strength of external governance (EG) interactively affect firm value and R&D investments.

Our results on firm valuation show how the relation between Tobin’s Q and managerial share ownership, a long-running controversy in the literature, depends on the strength of external pressure for good governance. When EG is weak, we find a hump shaped relation between Q and CEO ownership. Weak EG allows for greater managerial slack, providing more room for CEO ownership to either mitigate agency problems through the alignment effect or exacerbate insufficient risk taking problems by increasing CEO wealth sensitivity to performance. When EG is strong, the relation is insignificant. Strong EG holds CEOs accountable for their performance, leaving little slack for agency problems that can be mitigated or exacerbated by CEO ownership.

Our study also helps identify channels through which EG and CEO ownership affect Tobin’s Q. We find a significant hump shaped relation between R&D investments and CEO ownership when EG is weak, but find no relation when EG is strong. Because R&D investments tend to be discretionary and risky, these results support the hypothesis that CEO ownership has identifiable effects on agent efforts and project risk choices when EG is weak. The results also help articulate the nature of entrenchment effects causing the negative slope in the Q relation.

The full paper is available for download here .

  1. I’d guess ultimately it all boils down to achieving the right balance between CEO ownership and external governance. If the scales tilt too much on either side, then there’s the risk of either stifling creative freedom or giving one individual (i.e. the CEO) powers that far exceed the comfort levels of the minority shareholders.

    Comment by Sameer Kamat — September 12, 2010 @ 6:07 am

 

Add your comment below:

(required)

(required but not published)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

 
  •  » A "Web Winner" by The Philadelphia Inquirer
  •  » A "Top Blog" by LexisNexis
  •  » A "10 out of 10" by the American Association of Law Librarians Blog
  •  » A source for "insight into the latest developments" by Directorship Magazine