<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate Campaign Contributions and Abnormal Stock Returns after Presidential Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/12/26/corporate-campaign-contributions-and-abnormal-stock-returns-after-presidential-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/12/26/corporate-campaign-contributions-and-abnormal-stock-returns-after-presidential-elections/</link>
	<description>A law and economics blog from the Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance that gathers the latest news, opinion and research pertaining to corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James McRitchie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/12/26/corporate-campaign-contributions-and-abnormal-stock-returns-after-presidential-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-1647524</link>
		<dc:creator>James McRitchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=37612#comment-1647524</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to profit from this academic research. If Romney had won, it would have been easy. Invest in a basketful of 30 companies starting with Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo. With Obama it is a little more difficult given the top contributors: University of California	, Microsoft Corp, Google Inc, US Government, Harvard University. 

Note: The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations&#039; PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals&#039; immediate families.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to profit from this academic research. If Romney had won, it would have been easy. Invest in a basketful of 30 companies starting with Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo. With Obama it is a little more difficult given the top contributors: University of California	, Microsoft Corp, Google Inc, US Government, Harvard University. </p>
<p>Note: The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations&#8217; PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals&#8217; immediate families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Corporate Campaign Contributions and Abnormal Stock Returns after Presidential Elections&#8221; &#124; Election Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/12/26/corporate-campaign-contributions-and-abnormal-stock-returns-after-presidential-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-1645119</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Corporate Campaign Contributions and Abnormal Stock Returns after Presidential Elections&#8221; &#124; Election Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=37612#comment-1645119</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: The following post comes to us from Jürgen Huber, Professor of Finance at the University of Innsbruck, Austria, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: The following post comes to us from Jürgen Huber, Professor of Finance at the University of Innsbruck, Austria, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
