<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CQ2 | Ed Murphy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The case of the tricky captain: part one by Kelvin Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2011/08/21/the-case-of-the-tricky-captain-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-36224</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/?p=1492#comment-36224</guid>
		<description>Same request from me: that I would be very interested to hear about any research into the Enderby family. My own research has been on the (at the time, much lauded) captain and shareholder of the &quot;Samuel Enderby&quot;, William Lisle (1792-1870). Twenty years ago he was still being spoken of in his birthplace, far away from London, and using as a starting point a letter kept by his family, I have tried to flesh out his story... his fame as well as the personal loss it took... but there remain, of course, gaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same request from me: that I would be very interested to hear about any research into the Enderby family. My own research has been on the (at the time, much lauded) captain and shareholder of the &#8220;Samuel Enderby&#8221;, William Lisle (1792-1870). Twenty years ago he was still being spoken of in his birthplace, far away from London, and using as a starting point a letter kept by his family, I have tried to flesh out his story&#8230; his fame as well as the personal loss it took&#8230; but there remain, of course, gaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spanish galleons in Hawaii by Tom Bennett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2011/03/04/spanish-galleons-in-hawaii/comment-page-1/#comment-31425</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 08:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/?p=1315#comment-31425</guid>
		<description>There are at least two historical references that say the San Juanillo was wrecked on an outward voyage from Manila in 1578 in the San Bernardino Strait near Samar in the east of the Philippines.  As for the Santo Cristo de Burgos that loss is anybody&#039;s guess as she and all on board just vanished.  She is a strong contender for the Beeswax wrecksite in Oregon, and I have never come across the reference to Kona, if correct it was in 1693 .    Tom@Shipwrecks-Philippines.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are at least two historical references that say the San Juanillo was wrecked on an outward voyage from Manila in 1578 in the San Bernardino Strait near Samar in the east of the Philippines.  As for the Santo Cristo de Burgos that loss is anybody&#8217;s guess as she and all on board just vanished.  She is a strong contender for the Beeswax wrecksite in Oregon, and I have never come across the reference to Kona, if correct it was in 1693 .    <a href="mailto:Tom@Shipwrecks-Philippines.com">Tom@Shipwrecks-Philippines.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The case of the tricky captain: part one by John Stobaugh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2011/08/21/the-case-of-the-tricky-captain-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-28202</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stobaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 03:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/?p=1492#comment-28202</guid>
		<description>Mr. Payton, I am most interested in learning of your research regarding the Enderby family, from the London area and any knowledge of the midlands family(s).  Is your alluded to work published ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Payton, I am most interested in learning of your research regarding the Enderby family, from the London area and any knowledge of the midlands family(s).  Is your alluded to work published ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bhikkhuni: Revival of the Women&#8217;s Order by Jake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2011/12/15/bhikkhuni-revival-of-the-womens-order/comment-page-1/#comment-25933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/?p=1525#comment-25933</guid>
		<description>Heard a lot about the bhikkhuni ordination, seems like lot of hatred. One ex-monk informed me about this document, it can be downloaded from http://www.scribd.com/doc/64780914/The-Nude-Monk-s-Burning-Robes

In this document a Sri Lankan senior monk called Ariyadhamma says (on page 99), “starting a bhikkhuni dispensation means ‘grabbing the key to hell’s gate.” I was shocked how a Buddhist monk can hold such a narrow minded view, but then after reading the whole document it became clear, knowing lot of Dhamma superficially doesn’t mean that one has Dhamma within.

Truth is fascinating than fiction, one can learn a lot about modern Theravada Buddhism.

With METTA,
Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard a lot about the bhikkhuni ordination, seems like lot of hatred. One ex-monk informed me about this document, it can be downloaded from <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/64780914/The-Nude-Monk-s-Burning-Robes" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/64780914/The-Nude-Monk-s-Burning-Robes</a></p>
<p>In this document a Sri Lankan senior monk called Ariyadhamma says (on page 99), “starting a bhikkhuni dispensation means ‘grabbing the key to hell’s gate.” I was shocked how a Buddhist monk can hold such a narrow minded view, but then after reading the whole document it became clear, knowing lot of Dhamma superficially doesn’t mean that one has Dhamma within.</p>
<p>Truth is fascinating than fiction, one can learn a lot about modern Theravada Buddhism.</p>
<p>With METTA,<br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mysteries of the East, #2: The Enigma of Harwan by Persian Carpets</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2008/02/09/mysteries-of-the-east-2-the-enigma-of-harwan/comment-page-1/#comment-24649</link>
		<dc:creator>Persian Carpets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2008/02/09/mysteries-of-the-east-2-the-enigma-of-h#comment-24649</guid>
		<description>Mr. Murphy,

would it have been possible for carpets of this era to survive if stowed in clay or ceramic vessels. Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Murphy,</p>
<p>would it have been possible for carpets of this era to survive if stowed in clay or ceramic vessels. Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spanish books for toddlers by Ken Ashe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2008/05/20/spanish-books-for-toddlers/comment-page-1/#comment-24319</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Ashe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2008/05/20/spanish-books-for-toddlers/#comment-24319</guid>
		<description>This is a good list. I was looking for a few gifts for a friend, and I ended up buying 3 of these titles off of Amazon. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good list. I was looking for a few gifts for a friend, and I ended up buying 3 of these titles off of Amazon. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Coffee categories by Chris Caldon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2008/10/01/coffee-categories/comment-page-1/#comment-23733</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Caldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/?p=285#comment-23733</guid>
		<description>I travel to Costa Rica regularly to surf &amp; to me they have some of the best coffee in the world. Nothing like before a &quot;surf&quot;! Very good info here.
Thanks for the post,
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I travel to Costa Rica regularly to surf &amp; to me they have some of the best coffee in the world. Nothing like before a &#8220;surf&#8221;! Very good info here.<br />
Thanks for the post,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the architecture of Naypyidaw by Soe Thane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2007/09/04/on-the-architecture-of-naypyidaw/comment-page-1/#comment-18822</link>
		<dc:creator>Soe Thane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2007/09/04/on-the-architecture-of-naypyidaw/#comment-18822</guid>
		<description>They are not (residential) houses.  They are shop houses.  What you think is the garage is the shop.  The doors are closed because in the picture none of the shops were yet open.  There might be an apartment on the top floor for the owner.  If you go back to the same place now you will see it&#039;s like a market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not (residential) houses.  They are shop houses.  What you think is the garage is the shop.  The doors are closed because in the picture none of the shops were yet open.  There might be an apartment on the top floor for the owner.  If you go back to the same place now you will see it&#8217;s like a market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The case of the tricky captain: part one by Charles Payton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2011/08/21/the-case-of-the-tricky-captain-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-10549</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Payton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/?p=1492#comment-10549</guid>
		<description>May I caution all to the information in this item.  Both posters have so much wrong that it would not help anyone to believe them.  The words of Mr Dawson are the worst examples:

The First Samuel was&quot;&quot; Sam II’s&quot;&quot; grandfather; NOPE he was Samuel III not II

his Father was Daniel II who married Mary Cook! NOPE she was COCK and nothing whatsoever to do with James Cook

the Enderby’s being tanners at Bermondsey amongst other things would be entitled to go to Salters Hall. NOPE It was where they later worshipped.

The Enderby’s never lived in America YES but

ever since invading from Denmark area the Enderby’s lived in the midlands-Leicestershire- Boston Lincs- Spalding -Norfolk areas before coming to London around 1550; NOPE Mr Dawson belongs to that family not to the Enderbys in whaling.  There is no connection and this can be proved.

Sam II’s daughter Mary is aboard Captain Coffins ship with her new American Husband Nathaniel Wheatley at the Quarantine station NOPE NOPE NOPE Their marriage was in November.  The brig left over a month before they married.

It is in Hansard of the British Parliament that 120 of the 150 ships at Nantucket were of English ownership, all but one was destroyed in the civil war ...The what war? In any case this requires proof, what is the reference.

It is to be hoped the complete definitive and clear family history of the Enderbys of London will be published before a year is out - by me.  it is to come ahead of my major work on the period just BECAUSE of the rolling innacuracies and worse that appear all over.

Mr Dawson is aware of the above as I have had correspondence with him.

I did think of a critique for the Princess  Caroline book but it is not worthy of my time and does not stand up to even cursory examination.  Not a reference is given in it anywhere so caveat emptor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I caution all to the information in this item.  Both posters have so much wrong that it would not help anyone to believe them.  The words of Mr Dawson are the worst examples:</p>
<p>The First Samuel was&#8221;" Sam II’s&#8221;" grandfather; NOPE he was Samuel III not II</p>
<p>his Father was Daniel II who married Mary Cook! NOPE she was COCK and nothing whatsoever to do with James Cook</p>
<p>the Enderby’s being tanners at Bermondsey amongst other things would be entitled to go to Salters Hall. NOPE It was where they later worshipped.</p>
<p>The Enderby’s never lived in America YES but</p>
<p>ever since invading from Denmark area the Enderby’s lived in the midlands-Leicestershire- Boston Lincs- Spalding -Norfolk areas before coming to London around 1550; NOPE Mr Dawson belongs to that family not to the Enderbys in whaling.  There is no connection and this can be proved.</p>
<p>Sam II’s daughter Mary is aboard Captain Coffins ship with her new American Husband Nathaniel Wheatley at the Quarantine station NOPE NOPE NOPE Their marriage was in November.  The brig left over a month before they married.</p>
<p>It is in Hansard of the British Parliament that 120 of the 150 ships at Nantucket were of English ownership, all but one was destroyed in the civil war &#8230;The what war? In any case this requires proof, what is the reference.</p>
<p>It is to be hoped the complete definitive and clear family history of the Enderbys of London will be published before a year is out &#8211; by me.  it is to come ahead of my major work on the period just BECAUSE of the rolling innacuracies and worse that appear all over.</p>
<p>Mr Dawson is aware of the above as I have had correspondence with him.</p>
<p>I did think of a critique for the Princess  Caroline book but it is not worthy of my time and does not stand up to even cursory examination.  Not a reference is given in it anywhere so caveat emptor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The case of the tricky captain: part one by KEITH R. DAWSON</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/2011/08/21/the-case-of-the-tricky-captain-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-10369</link>
		<dc:creator>KEITH R. DAWSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 02:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cqtwo/?p=1492#comment-10369</guid>
		<description>The Enderby&#039;s were not Royalists, they supported Cromwell in the civil war getting lands at Waterford Ireland. money from theses lands when sold in 1660 possibly gave money to become shippers and merchants joining the Muscovy company, their place of business was Paules Wharfe now Pauls Walk on the northern bank of the Thames below the pedestrian suspension bridge. In 1803 the Greenwich wharfe was acquired with the assistance of the Morden College and renovated by Admiral Vansittart[before becoming Admiral]Samuel Enderby II[if you do not use numbers the wrong person is given credit where it should not be. The First Samuel was Sam II&#039;s grandfather; his Father was Daniel II who married Mary Cook! Samuel Enderby II at the time of his marriage to Elizabeth Buxton in June 1752 lived in Fish Street whilst Arthur Phillip lived in Bread street a very short distance away near Salters Hall which was the guild Hall for industry&#039;s using Salt
the Enderby&#039;s being tanners at Bermondsey amongst other things would be entitled to go to Salters Hall. Mrs. James Cooks family of Smiths were in buisines of leather in Bermondsey at the same time. Samuel Enderby II willed money to Salters Hall. The Enderby&#039;s never lived in America, ever since invading from Denmark area the Enderby&#039;s lived in the midlands-Leicestershire- Boston Lincs- Spalding -Norfolk areas before coming to London around 1550;
Family correspondence says the Enderby&#039;s owned two of the three ships at the Tea Party, the third was owned by their Boston, America Agent Francis Rotch; this is why only Francis is consulted by the &quot;Rebels&#039;; historians do not seem to question why only Francis is consulted about three ships. Sam II&#039;s daughter Mary is aboard Captain Coffins ship with her new American Husband Nathaniel Wheatley at the Quarantine station for a non existent Smallpox case that disappears the day after the other two ships form the first act of the Tea Party; the third ship is bought to the same wharfe the day after and he cargo discharged in the same manner. It is in Hansard of the British Parliament that 120 of the 150 ships at Nantucket were of English ownership, all but one was destroyed in the civil war. There is a lot more some of it is in my book Caroline Princess of Wales and other Forgotten People available through Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Enderby&#8217;s were not Royalists, they supported Cromwell in the civil war getting lands at Waterford Ireland. money from theses lands when sold in 1660 possibly gave money to become shippers and merchants joining the Muscovy company, their place of business was Paules Wharfe now Pauls Walk on the northern bank of the Thames below the pedestrian suspension bridge. In 1803 the Greenwich wharfe was acquired with the assistance of the Morden College and renovated by Admiral Vansittart[before becoming Admiral]Samuel Enderby II[if you do not use numbers the wrong person is given credit where it should not be. The First Samuel was Sam II&#8217;s grandfather; his Father was Daniel II who married Mary Cook! Samuel Enderby II at the time of his marriage to Elizabeth Buxton in June 1752 lived in Fish Street whilst Arthur Phillip lived in Bread street a very short distance away near Salters Hall which was the guild Hall for industry&#8217;s using Salt<br />
the Enderby&#8217;s being tanners at Bermondsey amongst other things would be entitled to go to Salters Hall. Mrs. James Cooks family of Smiths were in buisines of leather in Bermondsey at the same time. Samuel Enderby II willed money to Salters Hall. The Enderby&#8217;s never lived in America, ever since invading from Denmark area the Enderby&#8217;s lived in the midlands-Leicestershire- Boston Lincs- Spalding -Norfolk areas before coming to London around 1550;<br />
Family correspondence says the Enderby&#8217;s owned two of the three ships at the Tea Party, the third was owned by their Boston, America Agent Francis Rotch; this is why only Francis is consulted by the &#8220;Rebels&#8217;; historians do not seem to question why only Francis is consulted about three ships. Sam II&#8217;s daughter Mary is aboard Captain Coffins ship with her new American Husband Nathaniel Wheatley at the Quarantine station for a non existent Smallpox case that disappears the day after the other two ships form the first act of the Tea Party; the third ship is bought to the same wharfe the day after and he cargo discharged in the same manner. It is in Hansard of the British Parliament that 120 of the 150 ships at Nantucket were of English ownership, all but one was destroyed in the civil war. There is a lot more some of it is in my book Caroline Princess of Wales and other Forgotten People available through Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
