“…It felt somehow embarrassing, to be caught, to be named in the newspaper, to be kind of the victim of this. Half the people that I talked to about it would ask me, what should I do? On one hand, I wanted to tell them, hey, be safe, you probably don’t want to do it, but on the other hand, I had a very different reaction, I didn’t want to help an organization that had hurt me. I was supposed to kind of like infect the menatlity that file sharing is ok with this antivirus of no it’s not ok, it’s dangerous. [...] Before I was sued by the RIAA, I never interrogated what I was doing, really. It was an activity that was largely unreflected upon. And when this was going down, I remember thinking, ‘Wow, I did something wrong.’ And I still believe that I did something wrong. I didn’t have the right to take that music. What’s just dangerous here is that there’s this voice of the establishment speaking down on you, raining a morality of ‘This is right and this is wrong. You don’t own this, you can’t take it, you can’t make with it.’ And when you read these articles in Wired magazine, the New York Times, you know, major news sources, about the music industry losing money, I’m shocked that they can’t see the obviousness of ‘We alienated like the most lucrative of consumer pools, being teens and young adults.’ And when you alienate your primary consumer pool, it’s hard to get them to buy both the Britney Spears album while you’re busting them for downloading the Britney Spears album. And I think that these things need to be rectified.”