<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China Stiffens Penalties for Online Piracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dmablog/2006/05/30/china-stiffens-penalties-for-online-piracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dmablog/2006/05/30/china-stiffens-penalties-for-online-piracy/</link>
	<description>The blog of the Digital Media in Asia Project at Harvard Law School\'s Berkman Center for Internet &#38; Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:04:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: political forums</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dmablog/2006/05/30/china-stiffens-penalties-for-online-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>political forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dmablog/2006/05/30/china-stiffens-penalties-for-online-p#comment-504</guid>
		<description>In response to Denis Michael, Google is actively collaborating in providing software that filters out terms like &quot;democracy&quot; and probably other terms like &quot;free speech&quot; &quot;human rights&quot; &quot;Tibet&quot; etc.  China is a massively profitable market and Google has chosen to collaborate with the CCP&#039;s objectives of curtailing free speech in order to have access to that market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Denis Michael, Google is actively collaborating in providing software that filters out terms like &#8220;democracy&#8221; and probably other terms like &#8220;free speech&#8221; &#8220;human rights&#8221; &#8220;Tibet&#8221; etc.  China is a massively profitable market and Google has chosen to collaborate with the CCP&#8217;s objectives of curtailing free speech in order to have access to that market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: political forums</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dmablog/2006/05/30/china-stiffens-penalties-for-online-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>political forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dmablog/2006/05/30/china-stiffens-penalties-for-online-p#comment-503</guid>
		<description>One really has to think about what other possible benefits the CCP might get from cracking down on piracy.  I think that a lot of these attempts to crack down on bootlegging are just superficial.  Chinese bootlegging is rife.  I know Chinese people who routinely get bootlegged movies at amazing speed, sometimes within weeks after a movie is released in theaters.

I suspect that the real interest the CCP has in doing this is to control the media, under the guise of &quot;protecting decency&quot; and &quot;fighting piracy.&quot;  My site, which is a general political forum was actually banned in China from what I&#039;ve heard.  We have no content on our site that are tirades against China or long articles against China.  It&#039;s just that people speak the truth about how China controls the media and is a totalitarian regime, and the forum is a free environment to say whatever you want.  That&#039;s good enough reason for it to be banned I guess.  

The CCP seems to want control over easily accessible media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One really has to think about what other possible benefits the CCP might get from cracking down on piracy.  I think that a lot of these attempts to crack down on bootlegging are just superficial.  Chinese bootlegging is rife.  I know Chinese people who routinely get bootlegged movies at amazing speed, sometimes within weeks after a movie is released in theaters.</p>
<p>I suspect that the real interest the CCP has in doing this is to control the media, under the guise of &#8220;protecting decency&#8221; and &#8220;fighting piracy.&#8221;  My site, which is a general political forum was actually banned in China from what I&#8217;ve heard.  We have no content on our site that are tirades against China or long articles against China.  It&#8217;s just that people speak the truth about how China controls the media and is a totalitarian regime, and the forum is a free environment to say whatever you want.  That&#8217;s good enough reason for it to be banned I guess.  </p>
<p>The CCP seems to want control over easily accessible media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: required name</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dmablog/2006/05/30/china-stiffens-penalties-for-online-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>required name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 04:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/dmablog/2006/05/30/china-stiffens-penalties-for-online-p#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Check this article, it is quite a different view:

http://chinatechstory.blogspot.com/2006/05/web-copyright-law-vindicated-search.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this article, it is quite a different view:</p>
<p><a href="http://chinatechstory.blogspot.com/2006/05/web-copyright-law-vindicated-search.html" rel="nofollow">http://chinatechstory.blogspot.com/2006/05/web-copyright-law-vindicated-search.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
