Michael Robertson: 9 things the iPhone can’t do.
« Maybe they should call it ButtBook • Citizen journal breaks a heroic story »
« Maybe they should call it ButtBook • Citizen journal breaks a heroic story »
Michael Robertson: 9 things the iPhone can’t do.
November 25, 2009 in Business, Life, News, Politics, Science, Technology, infrastructure, problems
I just posted Rupert Murdoch vs. The Web, over at Linux Journal. In it I suggest that the Murdoch story (played mostly as Bing vs Google) is a red herring, and that the …
November 25, 2009 in Art, Berkman, Business, Future, Ideas, Journalism, Live Web, News, Past, infrastructure, music, problems, radio
@robpatrob (Robert Paterson) asks (responding to this tweet and this post) “Why would GBH line up against BUR? Why have a war between 2 Pub stations in same city?” (In …
November 23, 2009 in News, radio
The longest thread in the history of this blog belongs to Why WQXR is better off as a public radio station, which I posted on July 26, and still has comments this month. The …
November 21, 2009 in Business, Places, Travel
I’m back in Boston after a great few days in Utah at the Kynetx Impact conference, where VRM and related stuff was brought up and discussed at length. It was an inaugural effort …
November 16, 2009 in Berkman, VRM
Two posts worth noting over at the ProjectVRM blog. The first is Intention Economy Traction, which riffs off David Gillespie’s illustrative and wise 263-slide narrative Digital Strangelove (or How I Learned To …
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/07/besides-come-cheap/trackback/
September 7, 2007 at 2:07 pm
george girton
I had a Nokia E61 on Cingular (Michael Robertson reviews a similar phone), it was a great smart phone. I gave it up and went back to my rock-hardened Motorola V60 which has 1-touch calling (got
you on my speed dial, baby) and voice activated calling (”Miya!”) which works great, walking the dog at night. Just 2 features that even the Nokia is supposed to have, but when you get right down to the convenience factor — it doesn’t really have them the same way.
I know three people with iPhones and they love them to bits. It makes me happy to see that, too. I just don’t feel a bit bad that I don’t have one.
September 8, 2007 at 7:33 am
Jim Thompson
The iPhone success (I have one, so does the wife) is literally form over function.
People like it because it feels good and looks great. Thats all.
Everything Robertson lists is >software
September 8, 2007 at 11:25 pm
Doc Searls
A friend and Serious Major Hacker who also leveraged his N800 for all it was worth (and even did work on the Maemo team) told me a couple days ago that his efforts were better spent on the iPhone because the development community is bigger; and because “UI counts”. He likes the iPhone because it’s good at both form AND function. Making calls, even on the hated AT&T system, is easier and more straightforward on an iPhone than over the N800 using Skype or Gizmo. With all due credit to the latter. It was an interesting conversation.
September 9, 2007 at 9:19 pm
zeno
I need to strongly object to this statement. While the phone platform is currently closed (but then, it has only been out for two months, it may perhaps be opened in the future), the idea that Apple is locking users data into a proprietary system is completely wrong. All the data that syncs with the iPhone is through Address Book, iCal, Apple Mail, and iTunes. Every item in each of these programs, with the exception of DRMed media content, is utterly open — it is stored in open formats, it can be easily imported or exported, it can connect to standard servers with standard protocols. The iPhone supports IMAP or POP for email, Address Books can come and go as vcards, events as ics files, etc. I am very serious about controlling my own data. I managed to lose several years of events and emails and such because they are locked into a Microsoft Entourage binary blob that is nearly impossible to upgrade now that I don’t have access to old versions of Office and a non-OS X computer. But with the Apple formats I can feel relatively comfortable that when the time comes to move to a new platform or format or program, my data will be readily accessible.
September 10, 2007 at 1:56 pm
Cameron Barrett
I use the MobileChat application on my iPhone. It works flawlessly with any AIM account.
The iPhone is an amazing piece of technology. Everything is nearly perfect. I finally retired my Blackberry and now that I have an iPhone I don’t see myself giving it up anytime soon.
Apple has raised the bar yet again.
September 12, 2007 at 8:24 pm
Mr. Gunn
Some other things Nokias can do the iphone can’t:
sync over the air with an Exchange server using ActiveSync
cut and paste text
easily enter special symbols like slashes and punctuation
operate one-handed
be used by someone with big paws
be used without looking at the keyboard
3G data
cost less
I really think the people who say the iphone is perfect just haven’t used that many phones.