<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mission: Denial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/23/mission-denial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/23/mission-denial/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:14:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Peterson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/23/mission-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-2406</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/23/mission-denial/#comment-2406</guid>
		<description>Back in 2001,  while at BellSouth, I wrote about what I called the MediaNet - http://way.nu/medianet/.

&quot;Any medium whose distribution system disallows equal access to content from both amateur and professional publishers won’t work in a broadband world. Defining a platform by aggregation of content type (audio, video, etc.) will work, defining a platform through the aggregation of content by publisher will not.

Though it seems obvious, content publishers must compete on content, not platform.&quot;

Isn&#039;t it funny that content publishers don&#039;t want to be forced to compete on their content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2001,  while at BellSouth, I wrote about what I called the MediaNet &#8211; <a href="http://way.nu/medianet/" rel="nofollow">http://way.nu/medianet/</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any medium whose distribution system disallows equal access to content from both amateur and professional publishers won’t work in a broadband world. Defining a platform by aggregation of content type (audio, video, etc.) will work, defining a platform through the aggregation of content by publisher will not.</p>
<p>Though it seems obvious, content publishers must compete on content, not platform.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it funny that content publishers don&#8217;t want to be forced to compete on their content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Bond</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/23/mission-denial/comment-page-1/#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/23/mission-denial/#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>Remember AllOfMp3? It&#039;s still around.

I&#039;m still waiting for an official western download site that uses the same model, interface and pricing. Amazon? Oh, right. The Entertainment cartel would never allow it.

This is the point where I start getting angry with Apple and the Apple fans. The usual argument goes &quot;It&#039;s not Apple&#039;s fault iTMS uses DRM, it&#039;s the RIAA/MPAA&quot;. But who&#039;s the supplier and who&#039;s the customer? I don&#039;t buy from the RIAA/MPAA because they don&#039;t do retail. Apple is my supplier in this instance and I won&#039;t buy products from them that are Defective by Design. 

Just Say No To DRM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember AllOfMp3? It&#8217;s still around.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for an official western download site that uses the same model, interface and pricing. Amazon? Oh, right. The Entertainment cartel would never allow it.</p>
<p>This is the point where I start getting angry with Apple and the Apple fans. The usual argument goes &#8220;It&#8217;s not Apple&#8217;s fault iTMS uses DRM, it&#8217;s the RIAA/MPAA&#8221;. But who&#8217;s the supplier and who&#8217;s the customer? I don&#8217;t buy from the RIAA/MPAA because they don&#8217;t do retail. Apple is my supplier in this instance and I won&#8217;t buy products from them that are Defective by Design. </p>
<p>Just Say No To DRM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
