<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fee speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:17:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GNC-2007-10-02 #305 &#124; Geek News Central</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-157968</link>
		<dc:creator>GNC-2007-10-02 #305 &#124; Geek News Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-157968</guid>
		<description>[...] Payloads iPod Touch Review Zune Firmware to be Upgraded Shortly Nokia Unlocks and Slams Apple AT&amp;T and Verizon will drop you! iPhone Update iPhone Facts iPhone down grade iPhone Poll! PubMatic Storm Worm Yahoo Search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Payloads iPod Touch Review Zune Firmware to be Upgraded Shortly Nokia Unlocks and Slams Apple AT&#38;T and Verizon will drop you! iPhone Update iPhone Facts iPhone down grade iPhone Poll! PubMatic Storm Worm Yahoo Search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-111114</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-111114</guid>
		<description>Of course -both the fear of losing the service, coupled with the reputation (which is often false) has now become the norm of doing business. In Ireland we have EIRCOM - they rule the phone lines even though they couldn&#039;t organise a beer in a brewery. The vast majority of people need them, eventhough they refuse to roll out a decent broadband service. (some areas of Ireland are still on dial-up). Then you have our banks 

http://secretireland.blogspot.com/2008/11/bank-account-protection-in-ireland.html

Who say all accounts are protected, even though the protection is 12 times that of our GDP - how we going to pay for that. I cant wait to see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course -both the fear of losing the service, coupled with the reputation (which is often false) has now become the norm of doing business. In Ireland we have EIRCOM &#8211; they rule the phone lines even though they couldn&#8217;t organise a beer in a brewery. The vast majority of people need them, eventhough they refuse to roll out a decent broadband service. (some areas of Ireland are still on dial-up). Then you have our banks </p>
<p><a href="http://secretireland.blogspot.com/2008/11/bank-account-protection-in-ireland.html" rel="nofollow">http://secretireland.blogspot.com/2008/11/bank-account-protection-in-ireland.html</a></p>
<p>Who say all accounts are protected, even though the protection is 12 times that of our GDP &#8211; how we going to pay for that. I cant wait to see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: descarga gratis ruleta</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-47728</link>
		<dc:creator>descarga gratis ruleta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-47728</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;casino gamble best casino gamble internet online...&lt;/strong&gt;

Tonight free online slots game best casino gamble internet online...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>casino gamble best casino gamble internet online&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Tonight free online slots game best casino gamble internet online&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chsiren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-35977</link>
		<dc:creator>chsiren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-35977</guid>
		<description>Seth,

Just because it’s common practice, doesn’t make it right. If the TOS clause “damage the name or reputation” is not designed to censor or punish criticism, what is its purpose? A company’s reputation, good or bad, should depend on the quality of service they provide, not on the customer’s fear of losing service altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth,</p>
<p>Just because it’s common practice, doesn’t make it right. If the TOS clause “damage the name or reputation” is not designed to censor or punish criticism, what is its purpose? A company’s reputation, good or bad, should depend on the quality of service they provide, not on the customer’s fear of losing service altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-2751</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-2751</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s common practice means that it&#039;s not a telecomm attempt to censor or punish criticism.

I wish A-listers would be better than that.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/10/01/anti-defamation-provisions/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mor e skepticism&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s common practice means that it&#8217;s not a telecomm attempt to censor or punish criticism.</p>
<p>I wish A-listers would be better than that.</p>
<p><a href="http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/10/01/anti-defamation-provisions/" rel="nofollow">Mor e skepticism</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lurkerfan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-2750</link>
		<dc:creator>lurkerfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-2750</guid>
		<description>Seth,

Just because it&#039;s common practice, doesn&#039;t make it right.  If the TOS clause &quot;damage the name or reputation&quot; is not designed to censor or punish criticism, what is its purpose?  A company&#039;s reputation, good or bad, should depend on the quality of service they provide, not on the customer&#039;s fear of losing service altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth,</p>
<p>Just because it&#8217;s common practice, doesn&#8217;t make it right.  If the TOS clause &#8220;damage the name or reputation&#8221; is not designed to censor or punish criticism, what is its purpose?  A company&#8217;s reputation, good or bad, should depend on the quality of service they provide, not on the customer&#8217;s fear of losing service altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: odd time signatures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Techmeme Leaderboard: The Newest Whuffie Fuse Score</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-2744</link>
		<dc:creator>odd time signatures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Techmeme Leaderboard: The Newest Whuffie Fuse Score</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-2744</guid>
		<description>[...] is manufacturing tales to justify a plan to bomb Iran.&#160; It should be telling the story of Verizon and AT&amp;T&#8217;s end-user agreements forcing censorship down the throats and pipes of their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is manufacturing tales to justify a plan to bomb Iran.&nbsp; It should be telling the story of Verizon and AT&amp;T&#8217;s end-user agreements forcing censorship down the throats and pipes of their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/001264.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It&#039;s common boilerplate&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/001264.html" rel="nofollow">It&#8217;s common boilerplate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lurkerfan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>lurkerfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>&quot;They must be taking a lesson from the Myanmar authorities.&quot;

Exactly!  If our corporate leaders -- and our government leaders as well -- really realized how much their policies resemble those of the worst dictatorships on the globe, they MIGHT be ashamed.

On second thought, though, shame is dead.  The basic guide to behavior is not what is considered fair and decent by upright, moral people, much less what would be good for all of humankind.  Instead, unbridled capitalism, political leaders who pander to it, and human greed have created a society in which actions are based on whatever works -- what one can get by with.  And big corporations with their resources to hire lawyers and buy politicians can get by with screwing the customer.

I was just forced to buy a new cell phone when Cingular was bought by AT&amp;T, and of course it came with a new two-year commitment.  I&#039;d cancel tomorrow, though, if I thought I could get nationwide long distance and good coverage from any other company with a fairer contract.

Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They must be taking a lesson from the Myanmar authorities.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly!  If our corporate leaders &#8212; and our government leaders as well &#8212; really realized how much their policies resemble those of the worst dictatorships on the globe, they MIGHT be ashamed.</p>
<p>On second thought, though, shame is dead.  The basic guide to behavior is not what is considered fair and decent by upright, moral people, much less what would be good for all of humankind.  Instead, unbridled capitalism, political leaders who pander to it, and human greed have created a society in which actions are based on whatever works &#8212; what one can get by with.  And big corporations with their resources to hire lawyers and buy politicians can get by with screwing the customer.</p>
<p>I was just forced to buy a new cell phone when Cingular was bought by AT&amp;T, and of course it came with a new two-year commitment.  I&#8217;d cancel tomorrow, though, if I thought I could get nationwide long distance and good coverage from any other company with a fairer contract.</p>
<p>Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustbury.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-2707</link>
		<dc:creator>dustbury.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/09/29/fee-speech/#comment-2707</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;By comparison, Alberto Gonzales was a wuss...&lt;/strong&gt;

Doc Searls notes that AT&amp;T&#039;s Legal Policy runs over 10,000 words, and singles out this paragraph for special mention: AT&amp;T may immediately terminate or suspend all or a portion of your Service, any Member ID, electronic mail address, IP address,......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By comparison, Alberto Gonzales was a wuss&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Doc Searls notes that AT&amp;T&#8217;s Legal Policy runs over 10,000 words, and singles out this paragraph for special mention: AT&amp;T may immediately terminate or suspend all or a portion of your Service, any Member ID, electronic mail address, IP address,&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
