<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowing the answer is good. Building it is better.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/11/16/knowing-the-answer-is-good-building-it-is-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/11/16/knowing-the-answer-is-good-building-it-is-better/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:24:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/11/16/knowing-the-answer-is-good-building-it-is-better/comment-page-1/#comment-9409</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/11/16/knowing-the-answer-is-good-building-it-is#comment-9409</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, I think it gets the point quite readily.

Y&#039;know Doc, I see you writing what&#039;s essentially the same post over and over. It&#039;s basically: 

&quot;Corporations, only use your newfound manipulative powers for Good instead of Evil. I SAY SO. THIS IS WHAT I WANTED YOU TO DO! Sez me. That&#039;s what I meant ...&quot;.

There are so many stories with the plotline of powers given to an unworthy recipient who then proceeds to use them in a corrupt manner, it&#039;s sad you don&#039;t recognize when you&#039;re living out one (taking the above sentiment at face value, for the sake of discussion).

Critics keep pointing this out to you, over and over. And you keep replying you&#039;re a nice guy and want lions and lambs to lay down together. And the critics respond that you&#039;re only leading lambs to the slaughter. And you say that&#039;s not what you meant to do. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, I think it gets the point quite readily.</p>
<p>Y&#8217;know Doc, I see you writing what&#8217;s essentially the same post over and over. It&#8217;s basically: </p>
<p>&#8220;Corporations, only use your newfound manipulative powers for Good instead of Evil. I SAY SO. THIS IS WHAT I WANTED YOU TO DO! Sez me. That&#8217;s what I meant &#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<p>There are so many stories with the plotline of powers given to an unworthy recipient who then proceeds to use them in a corrupt manner, it&#8217;s sad you don&#8217;t recognize when you&#8217;re living out one (taking the above sentiment at face value, for the sake of discussion).</p>
<p>Critics keep pointing this out to you, over and over. And you keep replying you&#8217;re a nice guy and want lions and lambs to lay down together. And the critics respond that you&#8217;re only leading lambs to the slaughter. And you say that&#8217;s not what you meant to do. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
