<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The only real social networks are personal ones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: (Audio) Social Networks: Should companies build their own or join existing ones (like Facebook)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-27840</link>
		<dc:creator>(Audio) Social Networks: Should companies build their own or join existing ones (like Facebook)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-27840</guid>
		<description>[...] thought this heated debate was over, I took heat from Shel Israel and Doc Searls (look at all the trackbacks and comments) for my stance that in some situations, brands should [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought this heated debate was over, I took heat from Shel Israel and Doc Searls (look at all the trackbacks and comments) for my stance that in some situations, brands should [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to the Fifth Estate &#187; The Buzz Bin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-20270</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to the Fifth Estate &#187; The Buzz Bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 13:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-20270</guid>
		<description>[...] media (both content generators and casual readers) should be considered audiences, communities or just people! Ironically, this debate goes all the way back to the Cluetrain Manifesto and has superseded [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] media (both content generators and casual readers) should be considered audiences, communities or just people! Ironically, this debate goes all the way back to the Cluetrain Manifesto and has superseded [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicana Feliz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-18542</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicana Feliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-18542</guid>
		<description>Wrong, AOL was about meeting strangers because your friends and family still didn't have access to email.  Now the only good product AOL offers is not its browsers, that's for sure, but honestly the iChat application on apple computers. 
That's it.
It competes with Skype and only because Apple has helped it out so much.

In any case, Now, Facebook is about keeping strangers and strange people out.  You obviously don't have close friends because otherwise you'd know that.

Honestly, there's nothing more to say.  That is what makes facebook awesome, its known, its faster than Myspace, and you choose if you want to screw with your page, otherwise, just reject the zombie application and you'll be fine with a nice lite page that updates you on parties, groups, and tons of cool and interesting Real Life events, with only your closest friends or networks you left of people who were your closest friends, in say, academia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong, AOL was about meeting strangers because your friends and family still didn&#8217;t have access to email.  Now the only good product AOL offers is not its browsers, that&#8217;s for sure, but honestly the iChat application on apple computers.<br />
That&#8217;s it.<br />
It competes with Skype and only because Apple has helped it out so much.</p>
<p>In any case, Now, Facebook is about keeping strangers and strange people out.  You obviously don&#8217;t have close friends because otherwise you&#8217;d know that.</p>
<p>Honestly, there&#8217;s nothing more to say.  That is what makes facebook awesome, its known, its faster than Myspace, and you choose if you want to screw with your page, otherwise, just reject the zombie application and you&#8217;ll be fine with a nice lite page that updates you on parties, groups, and tons of cool and interesting Real Life events, with only your closest friends or networks you left of people who were your closest friends, in say, academia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hebben sociale netwerken een toekomst? &#124; RecruitmentMatters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-18489</link>
		<dc:creator>Hebben sociale netwerken een toekomst? &#124; RecruitmentMatters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-18489</guid>
		<description>[...] van mijn iconen, Doc Searls (&#8217;The Cluetrain Manifesto&#8217;) stelt het als volgt:Facebook to me is [&#8230;] a walled garden. It’s still somebody’s private space. Me, I’d [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] van mijn iconen, Doc Searls (&#8217;The Cluetrain Manifesto&#8217;) stelt het als volgt:Facebook to me is [&#8230;] a walled garden. It’s still somebody’s private space. Me, I’d [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quotes for the week ending 22 Dec, 2007 &#171;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-18487</link>
		<dc:creator>Quotes for the week ending 22 Dec, 2007 &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-18487</guid>
		<description>[...]  Doc Searls, on why he is not joining a debate on whether brands should build their own, or join social networks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Doc Searls, on why he is not joining a debate on whether brands should build their own, or join social networks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThinkingDifference</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-18408</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinkingDifference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-18408</guid>
		<description>I see little point in Facebook if your own social network is not there already. If your social network is geographically spread, then Facebook aggregates info you would otherwise email. If your social network is spatially close to you, then Facebook aggregates notes for doing things and keeping in touch, just as with the phone. 

I guess another case is when you do not have a social network - or when you are looking to build one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see little point in Facebook if your own social network is not there already. If your social network is geographically spread, then Facebook aggregates info you would otherwise email. If your social network is spatially close to you, then Facebook aggregates notes for doing things and keeping in touch, just as with the phone. </p>
<p>I guess another case is when you do not have a social network - or when you are looking to build one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can you kiss a brand under the mistletoe? : Beyond Mom &#124; Home of Martini Marketing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-18402</link>
		<dc:creator>Can you kiss a brand under the mistletoe? : Beyond Mom &#124; Home of Martini Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-18402</guid>
		<description>[...] Second, the notion of “brands” either “building” or “joining” social networks strikes me as inherently promotional in either case&#8230;(read full entry here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Second, the notion of “brands” either “building” or “joining” social networks strikes me as inherently promotional in either case&#8230;(read full entry here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Answers Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-12-18</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-18401</link>
		<dc:creator>Answers Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-12-18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-18401</guid>
		<description>[...]  The exclusive actual ethnic networks are individualized ones Great place by Doc. I conceive digit articulate that is absent is authenticity. Brands impact when they and the grouping behindhand them are authentic. (tags: brand2.0 marketing socialnetworks facebook) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  The exclusive actual ethnic networks are individualized ones Great place by Doc. I conceive digit articulate that is absent is authenticity. Brands impact when they and the grouping behindhand them are authentic. (tags: brand2.0 marketing socialnetworks facebook) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-12-21 &#171; The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-18353</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-12-21 &#171; The social media revolution (in 15 minutes)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-18353</guid>
		<description>[...] Doc Searls Weblog · The only real social networks are personal ones (tags: socialnetworks ningthing) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doc Searls Weblog · The only real social networks are personal ones (tags: socialnetworks ningthing) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no sense of place :: links for 2007-12-19</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-personal-ones/#comment-18336</link>
		<dc:creator>no sense of place :: links for 2007-12-19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2007/12/18/the-only-real-social-networks-are-persona#comment-18336</guid>
		<description>[...] Doc Searls Weblog · The only real social networks are personal ones good one from Doc (tags: open social networks)   Filed in Del.icio.us on December 19th, 2007. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doc Searls Weblog · The only real social networks are personal ones good one from Doc (tags: open social networks)   Filed in&nbsp;<a href="http://Del.icio.us" title="http://Del.icio. " target="_blank">Del.icio.us</a> on December 19th, 2007. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
