<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s call it a twiver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:29:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s the business value of twitter?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/comment-page-1/#comment-20764</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s the business value of twitter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/#comment-20764</guid>
		<description>[...] do much for a business (or for many individuals that I can see). But riding the river (or &#8220;twiver&#8221; as Doc calls it) is good for several [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do much for a business (or for many individuals that I can see). But riding the river (or &#8220;twiver&#8221; as Doc calls it) is good for several [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Castello</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/comment-page-1/#comment-20739</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/#comment-20739</guid>
		<description>This really got me thinking about a way to track &quot;entities&quot; and rolls their info together for aggregation (RDF maybe)... does this exist already, do you think?

http://earthpig.livejournal.com/35894.html

Great article - good mind candy!

-Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really got me thinking about a way to track &#8220;entities&#8221; and rolls their info together for aggregation (RDF maybe)&#8230; does this exist already, do you think?</p>
<p><a href="http://earthpig.livejournal.com/35894.html" rel="nofollow">http://earthpig.livejournal.com/35894.html</a></p>
<p>Great article &#8211; good mind candy!</p>
<p>-Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL 2.0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/comment-page-1/#comment-20695</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/#comment-20695</guid>
		<description>[...] Searls said something interesting in this post about Twitter and Facebook:  I’m sure there’s something on Facebook that does the same thing. But Facebook is AOL 2.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Searls said something interesting in this post about Twitter and Facebook:  I’m sure there’s something on Facebook that does the same thing. But Facebook is AOL 2.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter, tweets, twerps and now twivers &#171; Is this Future Shock?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/comment-page-1/#comment-20688</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter, tweets, twerps and now twivers &#171; Is this Future Shock?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/01/08/lets-call-it-a-twiver/#comment-20688</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter, tweets, twerps and now&#160;twivers  Doc Searls in another interesting post posits that part of the reason for the success of Twitter is the contrast between live vs. static and light vs. heavy What makes Twitter so good is that it’s lightweight and not ambitious about running your life. It</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, tweets, twerps and now&nbsp;twivers  Doc Searls in another interesting post posits that part of the reason for the success of Twitter is the contrast between live vs. static and light vs. heavy What makes Twitter so good is that it’s lightweight and not ambitious about running your life. It</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
