Comments on: Security at all costs http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/07/security-at-all-costs/ Same old blog, brand new place Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:15:54 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Roland Hesz http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/07/security-at-all-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-26235 Roland Hesz Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:53:11 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/07/security-at-all-costs/#comment-26235 Well, it will be scary. Like New York was under occupation. I hope it won't happen, or at least it will stop soon. Well, it will be scary. Like New York was under occupation.
I hope it won’t happen, or at least it will stop soon.

]]> By: Doc Searls http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/07/security-at-all-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-26231 Doc Searls Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:16:11 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/07/security-at-all-costs/#comment-26231 Yep. BO... jeez, I just spelled his initials.. what's his middle name? Anyway, Barack has testosterone fer-sure. It probably drives him as much as the next XY pol. I gather that it just doesn't make him paranoid, which is what you need to build out the National Security State. Unrelated: I once had a talented and unusually strong (as in, doesn't take shit off anybody) woman working for me. Once when somebody asked her what made her that way, she said, "Bigger ovaries." Anyway, yeah. It's nuts. Yep. BO… jeez, I just spelled his initials.. what’s his middle name? Anyway, Barack has testosterone fer-sure. It probably drives him as much as the next XY pol. I gather that it just doesn’t make him paranoid, which is what you need to build out the National Security State.

Unrelated: I once had a talented and unusually strong (as in, doesn’t take shit off anybody) woman working for me. Once when somebody asked her what made her that way, she said, “Bigger ovaries.”

Anyway, yeah. It’s nuts.

]]> By: Zo http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/07/security-at-all-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-26200 Zo Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:58:23 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/07/security-at-all-costs/#comment-26200 Well, the bejesus is scared out of <i>me.</i> How many of the nut cases who think up these plans for our "safety" will be gone with the, dare I call it, current administration? Operation Torch, my ass. Don't they see it's a whole new world--we don' need no steekeeng officers, no bomb-sniffing dogs--we need to sit down and talk on the world stage. I'm tellin' you, this militaristic crap won't fly when today's kids, who are already twittering across time and space, grow up. It also won't fly because it's primarily testosterone-driven--which is why I want to see Obama elected. (!) Well, the bejesus is scared out of me.

How many of the nut cases who think up these plans for our “safety” will be gone with the, dare I call it, current administration?

Operation Torch, my ass. Don’t they see it’s a whole new world–we don’ need no steekeeng officers, no bomb-sniffing dogs–we need to sit down and talk on the world stage.

I’m tellin’ you, this militaristic crap won’t fly when today’s kids, who are already twittering across time and space, grow up. It also won’t fly because it’s primarily testosterone-driven–which is why I want to see Obama elected. (!)

]]>