Comments on: Abandoning a stinking ship http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/ Same old blog, brand new place Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:30:56 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Doc Searls Weblog · What’s wrong with this picture? http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-78193 Doc Searls Weblog · What’s wrong with this picture? Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:42:05 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/#comment-78193 [...] we’re at it, Dave points out here that the contributions mechanism could use some improvement [...] [...] we’re at it, Dave points out here that the contributions mechanism could use some improvement [...]

]]> By: Andy Jackson http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-27294 Andy Jackson Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:14:53 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/#comment-27294 “I’m not sure what it is that makes folks on the right loathe (rather than merely dislike) the Clintons” I will tell you what it is. Let's start with the attempted hijacking of the "Health Care Industry" and 1/7 of the US economy. Folks on the right loathe socialism. When Hillary Rodham says things like "We're going to take some things away from you for the greater good" [link http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/marxist.asp ], the instictive response should be "The H**l you are". HRC is an international socialist thru-and-thru. Then we have the lying, and the lying about the lying. There is that little issue of Monica. And the Chinese fund-raising. And the 70+ people wanted for questioning by the FBI that have fled the country. And more [link http://www.therant.us/staff/swirsky/03132006.htm ] How someone as corrupt and power-mad as this could get so far in our government boggles my mind. But then again, we have the Kennedys as an example. Sigh. “I’m not sure what it is that makes folks on the right loathe (rather than merely dislike) the Clintons”

I will tell you what it is. Let’s start with the attempted hijacking of the “Health Care Industry” and 1/7 of the US economy. Folks on the right loathe socialism. When Hillary Rodham says things like “We’re going to take some things away from you for the greater good” [link http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/marxist.asp ], the instictive response should be “The H**l you are”. HRC is an international socialist thru-and-thru.

Then we have the lying, and the lying about the lying. There is that little issue of Monica. And the Chinese fund-raising. And the 70+ people wanted for questioning by the FBI that have fled the country. And more [link http://www.therant.us/staff/swirsky/03132006.htm ]

How someone as corrupt and power-mad as this could get so far in our government boggles my mind. But then again, we have the Kennedys as an example.
Sigh.

]]> By: Seth Finkelstein http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-27222 Seth Finkelstein Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:10:43 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/#comment-27222 Column up now: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/feb/14/politics.internet" rel="nofollow"> Great internet campaigns don't guarantee success in politics</a> Column up now:

Great internet campaigns don’t guarantee success in politics

]]> By: Russell Nelson http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-27037 Russell Nelson Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:48:38 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/#comment-27037 I don't like Hillary (I wonder if we would call her "Clinton" if her husband hadn't already been president -- or are we diminuating her because she's a woman by calling her by her first name) because she had NOTHING to do with New York State when she campaigned for the New York Senate. Of course it was obvious that she was only doing it so that she could launch a bid for the Presidency. I call her "That Carpetbagger". I don’t like Hillary (I wonder if we would call her “Clinton” if her husband hadn’t already been president — or are we diminuating her because she’s a woman by calling her by her first name) because she had NOTHING to do with New York State when she campaigned for the New York Senate. Of course it was obvious that she was only doing it so that she could launch a bid for the Presidency.

I call her “That Carpetbagger”.

]]> By: Jeff http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-26946 Jeff Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:28:14 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/#comment-26946 "I’m not sure what it is that makes folks on the right loathe (rather than merely dislike) the Clintons" It's not _just_ the Clinton's. America needs to close the book on the Bush's and the Clinton's and never hear from either of those family's again. It's time to move on... “I’m not sure what it is that makes folks on the right loathe (rather than merely dislike) the Clintons”

It’s not _just_ the Clinton’s. America needs to close the book on the Bush’s and the Clinton’s and never hear from either of those family’s again. It’s time to move on…

]]> By: Seth Finkelstein http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-26896 Seth Finkelstein Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:52:19 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/#comment-26896 You say: "Obviously her campaign team doesn’t get it, while Obama’s does." I'm living a little dangerously with this comment, but you may find interesting my _Guardian_ column which will be posted tomorrow. It approaches such ideas from a skeptical perspective (though the specifics used are Edwards and Paul). You say: “Obviously her campaign team doesn’t get it, while Obama’s does.”

I’m living a little dangerously with this comment, but you may find interesting my _Guardian_ column which will be posted tomorrow. It approaches such ideas from a skeptical perspective (though the specifics used are Edwards and Paul).

]]> By: Dave Winer http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-26874 Dave Winer Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:10:30 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/#comment-26874 I think Obama could use some help with the web too. Every time I want to give them money I have to start over from scratch, entering my credit card, address, expiration date, etc. They should job it out to Amazon, a 1-click button would get them a lot more of my money, quicker. I think Obama could use some help with the web too.

Every time I want to give them money I have to start over from scratch, entering my credit card, address, expiration date, etc.

They should job it out to Amazon, a 1-click button would get them a lot more of my money, quicker.

]]> By: Mike Warot http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/comment-page-1/#comment-26870 Mike Warot Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:29:53 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/12/abandoning-a-stinking-ship/#comment-26870 How can anyone have a conversation with handlers in the way? She voted for the war --Mike-- How can anyone have a conversation with handlers in the way?

She
voted
for
the
war

–Mike–

]]>