<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote du jour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:07:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/comment-page-1/#comment-27884</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/#comment-27884</guid>
		<description>The good thing about software patents being an egregiously bad idea, is that it provides a foot in the door to the idea that &lt;b&gt;patents are a bad idea&lt;/b&gt; (except to those to whom they are granted).

May this meme be multiplied by the multitudes, whether of minor or major rank, or nefarious or noble motive.

&lt;i&gt;I will not accept the enslavement of my fellow man, nor any imposition upon his liberty, as reward for the publication of my art.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good thing about software patents being an egregiously bad idea, is that it provides a foot in the door to the idea that <b>patents are a bad idea</b> (except to those to whom they are granted).</p>
<p>May this meme be multiplied by the multitudes, whether of minor or major rank, or nefarious or noble motive.</p>
<p><i>I will not accept the enslavement of my fellow man, nor any imposition upon his liberty, as reward for the publication of my art.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/comment-page-1/#comment-27880</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/#comment-27880</guid>
		<description>I have a bad habit of doing this stuff. I shouldn&#039;t.

Let&#039;s put it this way, it comes across as patronization to me, not respect. Yeah, yeah, I&#039;m sure it&#039;s all of the highest motives, and pay no attention to all the businesses trying to be built on the hopes and dreams of the Z-listers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a bad habit of doing this stuff. I shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s put it this way, it comes across as patronization to me, not respect. Yeah, yeah, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s all of the highest motives, and pay no attention to all the businesses trying to be built on the hopes and dreams of the Z-listers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/comment-page-1/#comment-27876</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/#comment-27876</guid>
		<description>Well, Seth, you&#039;re making me sorry I posted it. Really.

For what it&#039;s worth, I posted the quote only because I thought it gave the best bloggers some deserved respect — for the worth of their work, not for their position in a caste system. I certainly didn&#039;t post it to win social points.

Not that you&#039;ll believe me, but I&#039;m telling you what I know is true.

As for the &quot;digital sharecropping business&quot; line, I think it&#039;s wrong; but we&#039;re not likely to find commong ground there either, are we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Seth, you&#8217;re making me sorry I posted it. Really.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I posted the quote only because I thought it gave the best bloggers some deserved respect — for the worth of their work, not for their position in a caste system. I certainly didn&#8217;t post it to win social points.</p>
<p>Not that you&#8217;ll believe me, but I&#8217;m telling you what I know is true.</p>
<p>As for the &#8220;digital sharecropping business&#8221; line, I think it&#8217;s wrong; but we&#8217;re not likely to find commong ground there either, are we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/comment-page-1/#comment-27875</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/#comment-27875</guid>
		<description>Sure, but it carries very little information - it&#039;s not like he&#039;s arguing against a self-interest on his part. He runs a digital-sharecropping business which doesn&#039;t use any advanced algorithms. Mainly a lot a cult labor. So why would his opinion on software patents be meaningful? I don&#039;t want to be unfair, but that sounds a lot like what the Wikifolks call &quot;Argumentum Ad Jimboem&quot;, ie &quot;Jimbo sez ...&quot;.

This is one of the well-known problems with the A-list. You get social points for saying things that other people like, but worse, it&#039;s as if that proves anything other than it&#039;s a popular opinion among the A-list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, but it carries very little information &#8211; it&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s arguing against a self-interest on his part. He runs a digital-sharecropping business which doesn&#8217;t use any advanced algorithms. Mainly a lot a cult labor. So why would his opinion on software patents be meaningful? I don&#8217;t want to be unfair, but that sounds a lot like what the Wikifolks call &#8220;Argumentum Ad Jimboem&#8221;, ie &#8220;Jimbo sez &#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is one of the well-known problems with the A-list. You get social points for saying things that other people like, but worse, it&#8217;s as if that proves anything other than it&#8217;s a popular opinion among the A-list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/comment-page-1/#comment-27873</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/#comment-27873</guid>
		<description>So, did you at least like his point about software patents?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, did you at least like his point about software patents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/comment-page-1/#comment-27871</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/02/21/quote-du-jour-8/#comment-27871</guid>
		<description>[breaking my New Year&#039;s Resolution]

Yeah, but &quot;So what?&quot; The factual content is something like saying &quot;The best Chinese newspaper columnists are easily the equal of the best opinion columnists at the New York Times&quot;

I suspect he&#039;s slipping in a blog-evangelist strawman, the phony argument that the New York Times opinion columnists are better than every other writer in the entire world. Seen like that, it&#039;s a pretty silly thing to argue. Or maybe it&#039;s the idea that you can data-mine free workers, which is his business now.

Bah, no point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[breaking my New Year's Resolution]</p>
<p>Yeah, but &#8220;So what?&#8221; The factual content is something like saying &#8220;The best Chinese newspaper columnists are easily the equal of the best opinion columnists at the New York Times&#8221;</p>
<p>I suspect he&#8217;s slipping in a blog-evangelist strawman, the phony argument that the New York Times opinion columnists are better than every other writer in the entire world. Seen like that, it&#8217;s a pretty silly thing to argue. Or maybe it&#8217;s the idea that you can data-mine free workers, which is his business now.</p>
<p>Bah, no point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
