<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cluetrainings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:17:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lingolook &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My take on Cluetrain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/comment-page-1/#comment-82694</link>
		<dc:creator>Lingolook &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My take on Cluetrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/#comment-82694</guid>
		<description>[...] Cluetrainings - Doc Searls - Here are the slides from the Cluetrain @ 10 talk I gave at There&#8217;sa New Conversation, in New York last month and a video of the talk&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cluetrainings &#8211; Doc Searls &#8211; Here are the slides from the Cluetrain @ 10 talk I gave at There&#8217;sa New Conversation, in New York last month and a video of the talk&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lingolook &#187; My take on Cluetrain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/comment-page-1/#comment-48906</link>
		<dc:creator>Lingolook &#187; My take on Cluetrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/#comment-48906</guid>
		<description>[...] Cluetrainings - Doc Searls - Here are the slides from the Cluetrain @ 10 talk I gave at There’sa New Conversation, in New York last month and&#160;a video of the talk&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cluetrainings &#8211; Doc Searls &#8211; Here are the slides from the Cluetrain @ 10 talk I gave at There’sa New Conversation, in New York last month and&nbsp;a video of the talk&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Schmidt Marketing Troubleshooter &#187; The &#8220;I&#8217;d Take A Bullet For Them&#8221; List</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/comment-page-1/#comment-29476</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Schmidt Marketing Troubleshooter &#187; The &#8220;I&#8217;d Take A Bullet For Them&#8221; List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/#comment-29476</guid>
		<description>[...] people the light. Doc Searls would have never written The Cluetrain Manifesto, much less now be talking about Clueship. Seth Godin would be bookless. And so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people the light. Doc Searls would have never written The Cluetrain Manifesto, much less now be talking about Clueship. Seth Godin would be bookless. And so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Risley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/comment-page-1/#comment-29386</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Risley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 04:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/#comment-29386</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Doc, for this walk down memory lane and for evangelising the Cluetrain promise again.  It&#039;s needed.  While you&#039;ve been preaching the Cluetrain gospel for years now, hoping for adoption, I&#039;m afraid what we&#039;ve gotten in many cases is derivative religions, some of which are advertising-radical. As a disciple, I&#039;ve walked the straight and narrow, but I can&#039;t say the same for many of my PR-firm brethren or the corporate congregations I work with.  Many seem to want the easy path (advertising) to their salvation (more &quot;consumers&quot;).  Religious metaphors aside, selling clients on the idea of social media and the internet as a long-term, customer-relationship-builder is harder than selling it as a short-term, consumer-revenue-builder, but just because it&#039;s harder doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s not right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Doc, for this walk down memory lane and for evangelising the Cluetrain promise again.  It&#8217;s needed.  While you&#8217;ve been preaching the Cluetrain gospel for years now, hoping for adoption, I&#8217;m afraid what we&#8217;ve gotten in many cases is derivative religions, some of which are advertising-radical. As a disciple, I&#8217;ve walked the straight and narrow, but I can&#8217;t say the same for many of my PR-firm brethren or the corporate congregations I work with.  Many seem to want the easy path (advertising) to their salvation (more &#8220;consumers&#8221;).  Religious metaphors aside, selling clients on the idea of social media and the internet as a long-term, customer-relationship-builder is harder than selling it as a short-term, consumer-revenue-builder, but just because it&#8217;s harder doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Yankelovich</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/comment-page-1/#comment-29375</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Yankelovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/#comment-29375</guid>
		<description>Doc,

I got involved with CRM concepts and systems about 12 years ago because I saw an opportunity of truly improving relationship between suppliers and customers, i.e. people in marketplace. It surely sounds pretty naive to you, but I think it is a matter of intent and implementation rather than fundamental flaw in concept.

This is not intended to debate the value of VRM concept at all. I wonder how these two strategies could be viewed constructively. You have mentioned in your presentation that VRM Project may use some volunteer help,  how can I learn more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc,</p>
<p>I got involved with CRM concepts and systems about 12 years ago because I saw an opportunity of truly improving relationship between suppliers and customers, i.e. people in marketplace. It surely sounds pretty naive to you, but I think it is a matter of intent and implementation rather than fundamental flaw in concept.</p>
<p>This is not intended to debate the value of VRM concept at all. I wonder how these two strategies could be viewed constructively. You have mentioned in your presentation that VRM Project may use some volunteer help,  how can I learn more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Scrimshire</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/comment-page-1/#comment-29351</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Scrimshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/14/cluetrainings/#comment-29351</guid>
		<description>Doc,

Page 38 - spelling error Patries - I assume should be Parties.

BTW - I Love slide 36 on healthcare - you nailed it!

I am wanting to push the links between personal health records and data portability. Health is just another subset of MY data. 

http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/01/blogging-with-courage.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc,</p>
<p>Page 38 &#8211; spelling error Patries &#8211; I assume should be Parties.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; I Love slide 36 on healthcare &#8211; you nailed it!</p>
<p>I am wanting to push the links between personal health records and data portability. Health is just another subset of MY data. </p>
<p><a href="http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/01/blogging-with-courage.html" rel="nofollow">http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/01/blogging-with-courage.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
