<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cell companies vs. Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:15:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29882</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29882</guid>
		<description>Another option is this USB to PCMCIA adapter
http://www.elandigitalsystems.com/adapter/u111530.php
It&#039;s $91 here:http://www.synchrotech.com/products-expc/expresscard-pcmcia-pc_cardbus_dueladapter_01.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option is this USB to PCMCIA adapter<br />
<a href="http://www.elandigitalsystems.com/adapter/u111530.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.elandigitalsystems.com/adapter/u111530.php</a><br />
It&#8217;s $91 here:http://www.synchrotech.com/products-expc/expresscard-pcmcia-pc_cardbus_dueladapter_01.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29878</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29878</guid>
		<description>Yes, USB is equally fast. If your old modem is Rev0 then a new RevA modem will even be faster than the old one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, USB is equally fast. If your old modem is Rev0 then a new RevA modem will even be faster than the old one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29839</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29839</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Wes. I didn&#039;t know until today that the USB option existed. Is it equally fast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Wes. I didn&#8217;t know until today that the USB option existed. Is it equally fast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29838</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29838</guid>
		<description>Try buying a USB EVDO modem on eBay then performing an ESN swap on your account. Then you can sell the old modem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try buying a USB EVDO modem on eBay then performing an ESN swap on your account. Then you can sell the old modem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carterfsmith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29811</link>
		<dc:creator>carterfsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29811</guid>
		<description>hey Frank, the f stands for free, which is how the Internet should be - like radio and, er television (except for cable and PBS) . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Frank, the f stands for free, which is how the Internet should be &#8211; like radio and, er television (except for cable and PBS) . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Paynter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29806</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Paynter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29806</guid>
		<description>A well crafted and equitably enforced regulatory policy would protect us from the rapacious greed of the oligopoly.

(Also, I gotta know -- does the &quot;f&quot; in Carter f Smith stand for &quot;fone?&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well crafted and equitably enforced regulatory policy would protect us from the rapacious greed of the oligopoly.</p>
<p>(Also, I gotta know &#8212; does the &#8220;f&#8221; in Carter f Smith stand for &#8220;fone?&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carter f Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29797</link>
		<dc:creator>Carter f Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29797</guid>
		<description>Great News! Google has the solution to all your mobile Internet needs . . . let&#039;s have a big hand for the &#039;WiFi on steroids&#039; networks!

Check out the Free Press post, which says: Google&#039;s proposal can be expected to generate lots of opposition from the big wireless companies like Verizon and AT&amp;T, which want to protect their massive investments in what are proprietary networks.

Ya think?

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080325/BLOG01/80325035</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great News! Google has the solution to all your mobile Internet needs . . . let&#8217;s have a big hand for the &#8216;WiFi on steroids&#8217; networks!</p>
<p>Check out the Free Press post, which says: Google&#8217;s proposal can be expected to generate lots of opposition from the big wireless companies like Verizon and AT&amp;T, which want to protect their massive investments in what are proprietary networks.</p>
<p>Ya think?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080325/BLOG01/80325035" rel="nofollow">http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080325/BLOG01/80325035</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Leyden</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29764</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Leyden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29764</guid>
		<description>It is time for the iPhone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is time for the iPhone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29763</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29763</guid>
		<description>PXLated, I had both a tethered and a bluetooth setup before I went with the EvDO. I need to go back to that. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PXLated, I had both a tethered and a bluetooth setup before I went with the EvDO. I need to go back to that. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Gahran</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-29762</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gahran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/03/25/cell-companies-vs-internet/#comment-29762</guid>
		<description>Doc,

Unlocked cell phones are a smal step in the right direction. Maybe we need unlocked EVDO cards next.

Carriers have been deliberately crippling the mobile market in this country for years. What kind of a business strategy is that? Talk about losing sight of the big picture...

- Amy Gahran</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc,</p>
<p>Unlocked cell phones are a smal step in the right direction. Maybe we need unlocked EVDO cards next.</p>
<p>Carriers have been deliberately crippling the mobile market in this country for years. What kind of a business strategy is that? Talk about losing sight of the big picture&#8230;</p>
<p>- Amy Gahran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
