<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote du decade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/01/quote-du-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/01/quote-du-decade/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:14:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: José Murilo Junior</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/01/quote-du-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-33181</link>
		<dc:creator>José Murilo Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/01/quote-du-decade/#comment-33181</guid>
		<description>Hey Doc,

We here in Brazil &lt;a href=&quot;http://homembit.com/2008/04/openxml-they-really-won.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;are mad&lt;/a&gt; about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1123&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ISO&#039;s approval of Microsoft&#039;s OOXML&lt;/a&gt;. We know &lt;a href=&quot;http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2008/Apr-02.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the arguments for it&lt;/a&gt;, but it is difficult to swallow &lt;a href=&quot;http://fringethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/its-mostly-official-iso-approves-ooxml/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the methods used&lt;/a&gt; to reach the decision. Can we say that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/02/technology/02soft.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;US approach&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/microsofts-great-besmirching&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the issue&lt;/a&gt; is a sign that another horse called &#039;public standards&#039; was also on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9909499-7.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;that boat to Europe&lt;/a&gt;. I&#039;d love to hear you on that.

Greetings from a Brazilian fan.
José.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Doc,</p>
<p>We here in Brazil <a href="http://homembit.com/2008/04/openxml-they-really-won.html" rel="nofollow">are mad</a> about <a href="http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1123" rel="nofollow">ISO&#8217;s approval of Microsoft&#8217;s OOXML</a>. We know <a href="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2008/Apr-02.html" rel="nofollow">the arguments for it</a>, but it is difficult to swallow <a href="http://fringethoughts.wordpress.com/2008/04/02/its-mostly-official-iso-approves-ooxml/" rel="nofollow">the methods used</a> to reach the decision. Can we say that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/02/technology/02soft.html" rel="nofollow">US approach</a> on <a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/microsofts-great-besmirching" rel="nofollow">the issue</a> is a sign that another horse called &#8216;public standards&#8217; was also on <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9909499-7.html" rel="nofollow">that boat to Europe</a>. I&#8217;d love to hear you on that.</p>
<p>Greetings from a Brazilian fan.<br />
José.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
