<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to stop blowing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:39:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Opted In vs. Engaging In &#171; Wide Open Spaces</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-48298</link>
		<dc:creator>Opted In vs. Engaging In &#171; Wide Open Spaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-48298</guid>
		<description>[...] was reminded of this while reading Doc Searl&#8217;s blog just now, him talking about a piece Chris Anderson (editor at Wired) wrote on recognising a real if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was reminded of this while reading Doc Searl&#8217;s blog just now, him talking about a piece Chris Anderson (editor at Wired) wrote on recognising a real if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve MacLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38554</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve MacLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38554</guid>
		<description>I literally just used this example in a presentation. Who sends those things back? I&#039;ve used them to take notes on, a drink coaster, paper airplane, and other random things, but I&#039;ve never once sent one back in. If they stopped putting them in...would anyone really notice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I literally just used this example in a presentation. Who sends those things back? I&#8217;ve used them to take notes on, a drink coaster, paper airplane, and other random things, but I&#8217;ve never once sent one back in. If they stopped putting them in&#8230;would anyone really notice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Rowan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38545</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38545</guid>
		<description>I teach some modules on online marketing to the magazine industry in the UK... it&#039;s *very* clear that digital marketing thinking cuts right across analogue (print) techniques.

&quot;Digital&quot; is much more sensitive to feelings of the 99.9x% that don&#039;t respond to promotions... but it&#039;s also clear that many of these junior marketing folk aren&#039;t working in departments that are indoctrinated in testing, measurement &amp; management of their marketing.

If publications thought more about the Return on Investment on marketing, many of those loose blow-ins wouldn&#039;t stack up.

(stay healthy Doc!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I teach some modules on online marketing to the magazine industry in the UK&#8230; it&#8217;s *very* clear that digital marketing thinking cuts right across analogue (print) techniques.</p>
<p>&#8220;Digital&#8221; is much more sensitive to feelings of the 99.9x% that don&#8217;t respond to promotions&#8230; but it&#8217;s also clear that many of these junior marketing folk aren&#8217;t working in departments that are indoctrinated in testing, measurement &amp; management of their marketing.</p>
<p>If publications thought more about the Return on Investment on marketing, many of those loose blow-ins wouldn&#8217;t stack up.</p>
<p>(stay healthy Doc!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38502</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38502</guid>
		<description>I feel a blog post coming on: Dead Elephants and Marketing Insanity.  
(Now, if I can just find a photo with a pile of BS toppling over on the elephant...;-)

Jan - I&#039;m with you - if Gourmet can print a separate cover for subscribers...couldn&#039;t they also not put in those dang cards? If I do lend the magazine to someone - they&#039;re adults,  have subscribed to magazines before - and know they can get a much better deal online.  

Somehow I don&#039;t think this will ever be the title of a marketing book: &quot;Want Business?  Do MORE of the Things You KNOW Piss People OFF!&quot;  Yet, that&#039;s how many marketers operate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel a blog post coming on: Dead Elephants and Marketing Insanity.<br />
(Now, if I can just find a photo with a pile of BS toppling over on the elephant&#8230;;-)</p>
<p>Jan &#8211; I&#8217;m with you &#8211; if Gourmet can print a separate cover for subscribers&#8230;couldn&#8217;t they also not put in those dang cards? If I do lend the magazine to someone &#8211; they&#8217;re adults,  have subscribed to magazines before &#8211; and know they can get a much better deal online.  </p>
<p>Somehow I don&#8217;t think this will ever be the title of a marketing book: &#8220;Want Business?  Do MORE of the Things You KNOW Piss People OFF!&#8221;  Yet, that&#8217;s how many marketers operate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Hammock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38454</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Hammock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38454</guid>
		<description>Doc, in the February issue of Wired, in a cover story about annoying things, a two-page spread was devoted to blow-in cards. I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hammock.com/craft/2008/01/theres_nothing_we_find_more_fu.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote about it at the time&lt;/a&gt; as I thought it a great follow-up to Chris&#039; earlier post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, in the February issue of Wired, in a cover story about annoying things, a two-page spread was devoted to blow-in cards. I <a href="http://www.hammock.com/craft/2008/01/theres_nothing_we_find_more_fu.php" rel="nofollow">wrote about it at the time</a> as I thought it a great follow-up to Chris&#8217; earlier post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38431</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38431</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind so much the cards that come in publications I purchase at a news agent or store; after all, I guess they do want me to subscribe.  But I deeply resent having to field-strip subscription publications when they arrive at my home.  I&#039;m already subscribing - why should I be targeted with a card?  Just a thought but why do all those loose cards stay in throughout shipment and postal handling, only to fall out the moment they cross my threshold?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind so much the cards that come in publications I purchase at a news agent or store; after all, I guess they do want me to subscribe.  But I deeply resent having to field-strip subscription publications when they arrive at my home.  I&#8217;m already subscribing &#8211; why should I be targeted with a card?  Just a thought but why do all those loose cards stay in throughout shipment and postal handling, only to fall out the moment they cross my threshold?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38426</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38426</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve often been tempted to fill out blow-ins (as well as bound ins) with nonsense and dump them back in the mail.

Just not worth my time
Same as Mary - all go to recycle bin (amidst grumbles)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often been tempted to fill out blow-ins (as well as bound ins) with nonsense and dump them back in the mail.</p>
<p>Just not worth my time<br />
Same as Mary &#8211; all go to recycle bin (amidst grumbles)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Warot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38422</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Warot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38422</guid>
		<description>I think Chris nailed it right on the head when he talked about the problem of costs that are unmeasured or externalized. This is the source of spam, advertising, etc. It&#039;s all about pushing costs away from view.
It also works (for a while, perhaps a generation at a time) in Politics, until the pile of BS is so big that it falls over and kills the elephant in the room. ;-)
Hope you&#039;re feeling better. Just took Virginia for her first walk around the block, ever.  She got to see the flowers, and pick up a stick to carry around. She&#039;s sleeping it off now.
--Mike--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Chris nailed it right on the head when he talked about the problem of costs that are unmeasured or externalized. This is the source of spam, advertising, etc. It&#8217;s all about pushing costs away from view.<br />
It also works (for a while, perhaps a generation at a time) in Politics, until the pile of BS is so big that it falls over and kills the elephant in the room. <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Hope you&#8217;re feeling better. Just took Virginia for her first walk around the block, ever.  She got to see the flowers, and pick up a stick to carry around. She&#8217;s sleeping it off now.<br />
&#8211;Mike&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38418</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38418</guid>
		<description>I never throw out those insert cards.  Why, they have so many good household uses.  Toddlers can play post office with them!  Older kids can stack them in the fireplace grate along with the kindling!  They make dandy bookmarks!  Kids playing office games can feed them to the shredder!  Can&#039;t find the shovel?  They can be used to pick up swept kitchen crumbs! 
I&#039;m sure I can think of more.  And I&#039;ll bet the marketing gurus would be SO happy to know their design, printing, and distribution dollars are not going to waste !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never throw out those insert cards.  Why, they have so many good household uses.  Toddlers can play post office with them!  Older kids can stack them in the fireplace grate along with the kindling!  They make dandy bookmarks!  Kids playing office games can feed them to the shredder!  Can&#8217;t find the shovel?  They can be used to pick up swept kitchen crumbs!<br />
I&#8217;m sure I can think of more.  And I&#8217;ll bet the marketing gurus would be SO happy to know their design, printing, and distribution dollars are not going to waste !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Marti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/comment-page-1/#comment-38400</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/15/time-to-stop-blowing/#comment-38400</guid>
		<description>Why not make Business Reply Mail cards and envelopes have a redemption value, like cans and bottles?  Collect n BRM items, turn them in at the post office, and they give you a stamp, and the holder of the BRM permit pays for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not make Business Reply Mail cards and envelopes have a redemption value, like cans and bottles?  Collect n BRM items, turn them in at the post office, and they give you a stamp, and the holder of the BRM permit pays for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
