<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I was overheard to have said</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls Weblog &#183; The Turing Test gets harder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-78202</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls Weblog &#183; The Turing Test gets harder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-78202</guid>
		<description>[...] to feed    &#171; I was overheard to have said &#160;&#8226;&#160; Making the world safe for infrastructure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to feed    &laquo; I was overheard to have said &nbsp;&bull;&nbsp; Making the world safe for infrastructure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-39167</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-39167</guid>
		<description>Lara

And (assuming you have enough neurons activated) you can ...

Delete

Back from wonderful dinner with associates, but followed up with a couple of quick emails with links to expand on the conversation (Stewart Brand at TED, some LongNow stuff, bits on polls vs markets, China etc)

Online tools expand communication, enrich it, elaborate thougths</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lara</p>
<p>And (assuming you have enough neurons activated) you can &#8230;</p>
<p>Delete</p>
<p>Back from wonderful dinner with associates, but followed up with a couple of quick emails with links to expand on the conversation (Stewart Brand at TED, some LongNow stuff, bits on polls vs markets, China etc)</p>
<p>Online tools expand communication, enrich it, elaborate thougths</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VelciaL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-39147</link>
		<dc:creator>VelciaL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-39147</guid>
		<description>@Thai: Twitter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Thai: Twitter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-38550</link>
		<dc:creator>lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-38550</guid>
		<description>Really old people communicate by actually going over, seeing someone and TALKING.  Remember that?  I was but a chickadee when we elders would actually use our voices.  But the good news is, even when I&#039;m sick, tired, or too drunk, I can still text, email, faceyou, Ping you, and never, ever have to use my voice again.  Whew, thank GOD for technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really old people communicate by actually going over, seeing someone and TALKING.  Remember that?  I was but a chickadee when we elders would actually use our voices.  But the good news is, even when I&#8217;m sick, tired, or too drunk, I can still text, email, faceyou, Ping you, and never, ever have to use my voice again.  Whew, thank GOD for technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cushman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-38540</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cushman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-38540</guid>
		<description>Hi Doc, hope you&#039;re on the mend. If you didn&#039;t say that I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve thought it. 
There&#039;s a standing joke in the mobile industry that the older ceos and directors are the ones on blackberries - because of the email functionality.
For me choice of comms is about usefulness in context. twitter serves pretty well in most contexts including many-to-many, text serves perfectly for one-to-one contexts. email doesn&#039;t hit the button for either.
Guess that&#039;s why we are walking away from it.
The email that survives (if any) will of course be the most open - so web-based will stuff the closed systems of the kind many businesses employ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Doc, hope you&#8217;re on the mend. If you didn&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve thought it.<br />
There&#8217;s a standing joke in the mobile industry that the older ceos and directors are the ones on blackberries &#8211; because of the email functionality.<br />
For me choice of comms is about usefulness in context. twitter serves pretty well in most contexts including many-to-many, text serves perfectly for one-to-one contexts. email doesn&#8217;t hit the button for either.<br />
Guess that&#8217;s why we are walking away from it.<br />
The email that survives (if any) will of course be the most open &#8211; so web-based will stuff the closed systems of the kind many businesses employ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thaistory</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-38537</link>
		<dc:creator>Thaistory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-38537</guid>
		<description>Then, how do young people communicate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then, how do young people communicate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Warot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-38503</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Warot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-38503</guid>
		<description>4 years ago &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2004/11/29/in-south-korea-email-is-for-old-people/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;In South Korea, email is for old people&lt;/a&gt;... we&#039;re all behind the power curve her in the crusty old fashioned blog-o-sphere.
If email is old fashioned... what&#039;s next? Information overload seems to be the way of life now.
--Mike--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 years ago <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2004/11/29/in-south-korea-email-is-for-old-people/" rel="nofollow">In South Korea, email is for old people</a>&#8230; we&#8217;re all behind the power curve her in the crusty old fashioned blog-o-sphere.<br />
If email is old fashioned&#8230; what&#8217;s next? Information overload seems to be the way of life now.<br />
&#8211;Mike&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Flynn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-38500</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-38500</guid>
		<description>Sorry - meant to say insightful &lt;i&gt;comment&lt;/i&gt; &#8211; not post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; meant to say insightful <i>comment</i> &ndash; not post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Flynn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/comment-page-1/#comment-38499</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/17/i-was-overheard-to-have-said/#comment-38499</guid>
		<description>Sorry Doc, I posted a correction.  I thought it was at least an insightful post.  Unfortunately, I believe it was someone on a stage who passed the quote as yours.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=email+%22old+people%22+communicate&amp;btnG=Search&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;It seems that&lt;/a&gt; many people may have been quoted as saying that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Doc, I posted a correction.  I thought it was at least an insightful post.  Unfortunately, I believe it was someone on a stage who passed the quote as yours.  <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=email+%22old+people%22+communicate&amp;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">It seems that</a> many people may have been quoted as saying that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
