<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indeed we won!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/29/indeed-we-won/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/29/indeed-we-won/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jason bogovich</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/29/indeed-we-won/#comment-42555</link>
		<dc:creator>jason bogovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/04/29/indeed-we-won/#comment-42555</guid>
		<description>Doc, congrats! I just found VRM a few minutes ago. I don't know why I haven't been reading your feed as much as I used to. 

I've been talking a lot @ work about our needs to manage our vendor relationships better, and empower and hold responsible our employees more, in an effort to reduce vendor lock-in &#38; better satisfy the users of a company's technology. 

Google is a great case study in what happens when you put the power of open source and business objectives in the hands of your company architects &#38; engineers. 

If VP's are responsible for business results why are engineers not responsible for more of the infrastructure and those types of results. Much of it's engineering but a lot of it is emerging standards/blueprints like these. 

I've always said that a relationship doesn't start or end with a transaction, it's so very true. I love that feeling when there is a project for something you've felt for a long time, many times it takes a person like you--or Chris Saad for instance--to get it moving.

Thanks again &#38; bravo! 

P.S. Looking forward to diving into the VRM concept more later today.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, congrats! I just found VRM a few minutes ago. I don&#8217;t know why I haven&#8217;t been reading your feed as much as I used to. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been talking a lot @ work about our needs to manage our vendor relationships better, and empower and hold responsible our employees more, in an effort to reduce vendor lock-in &amp; better satisfy the users of a company&#8217;s technology. </p>
<p>Google is a great case study in what happens when you put the power of open source and business objectives in the hands of your company architects &amp; engineers. </p>
<p>If VP&#8217;s are responsible for business results why are engineers not responsible for more of the infrastructure and those types of results. Much of it&#8217;s engineering but a lot of it is emerging standards/blueprints like these. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always said that a relationship doesn&#8217;t start or end with a transaction, it&#8217;s so very true. I love that feeling when there is a project for something you&#8217;ve felt for a long time, many times it takes a person like you&#8211;or Chris Saad for instance&#8211;to get it moving.</p>
<p>Thanks again &amp; bravo! </p>
<p>P.S. Looking forward to diving into the VRM concept more later today.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
