<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging 4 Bux, cont&#8217;d</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/05/20/blogging-4-bux-contd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/05/20/blogging-4-bux-contd/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Caddell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/05/20/blogging-4-bux-contd/#comment-52511</link>
		<dc:creator>John Caddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/05/20/columbus-and-i/#comment-52511</guid>
		<description>Doc, I've found that the blogs on my RSS list with the most advertising are read the least. And I've banished a few from that list that got too commercial.

The ads get in the way visually, and also hover over the posts themselves. "Is that guy talking about this particular email marketing package because he's being paid to?" So a post has to be really powerful to cut through that background noise. Few are.

A blog is a self-promotional vehicle at some level regardless. Without ads, it is certainly clear who is being promoted: the author.

(Disclosure: I host a strip of Google ads on my blog, as an experiment. I hope to make enough this month to pay for a dirty Chai at my local coffee shop, with a tip.)

Regards, John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, I&#8217;ve found that the blogs on my RSS list with the most advertising are read the least. And I&#8217;ve banished a few from that list that got too commercial.</p>
<p>The ads get in the way visually, and also hover over the posts themselves. &#8220;Is that guy talking about this particular email marketing package because he&#8217;s being paid to?&#8221; So a post has to be really powerful to cut through that background noise. Few are.</p>
<p>A blog is a self-promotional vehicle at some level regardless. Without ads, it is certainly clear who is being promoted: the author.</p>
<p>(Disclosure: I host a strip of Google ads on my blog, as an experiment. I hope to make enough this month to pay for a dirty Chai at my local coffee shop, with a tip.)</p>
<p>Regards, John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/05/20/blogging-4-bux-contd/#comment-52489</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/05/20/columbus-and-i/#comment-52489</guid>
		<description>Well, I'm currently working on a widget to enable a blogger's readers to pledge a penny per article, so I'm pretty confident about the possibilities of a decent revenue model for bloggers, i.e. making money without cannibalising one's integrity and audience's goodwill.

However, I am sympathetic with the idea that bloggers being rewarded for promoting something else (by its merchant) may not have so much of a future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m currently working on a widget to enable a blogger&#8217;s readers to pledge a penny per article, so I&#8217;m pretty confident about the possibilities of a decent revenue model for bloggers, i.e. making money without cannibalising one&#8217;s integrity and audience&#8217;s goodwill.</p>
<p>However, I am sympathetic with the idea that bloggers being rewarded for promoting something else (by its merchant) may not have so much of a future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
