« Killer “journalism” • Tropical Massachusetts »
November 7, 2009 in infrastructure
Not long after I overheard a Comcast ad on a college football broadcast, the doorbell rang. It was a guy wearing a Comcast shirt and carrying a clipboard-type contraption with some kind of a phone-like …
November 5, 2009 in Business, Cluetrain
So I just went to look up Debora Spar’s Ruling the Waves, on Amazon, and was greeted by the above. Never mind that I wasn’t looking …
November 5, 2009 in Events, Fun, UCSB, cits
For my readers in Santa Barbara, I highly invite you to come over to the open house, Noon-2pm today at CITS — the Center for Information Technology and Society …
October 31, 2009 in Journalism
On Thursday, right after failing to get a root canal for the Xth time (saga here), I participated in a square-table discussion (I say that because we sat around a table with four corners) …
October 31, 2009 in Ideas, infrastructure
In response to my essay Framing the Net, on Publius, Rikke Frank Jørgensen has posted Metaphors We Regulate By. Her summary lines: “I have found four categories to be dominant …
7 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/05/29/a-little/trackback/
May 29, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Chip
Well, I tried calling the peak
Failed before, maybe now
Isn’t it odd that this is a day after the Exxon shareholder’s meeting?
Just one of the calendar things
May 29, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Mike Warot
Chip,
I agree it’s a calendar thing… there are a lot of options that expire this week, and some VERY large amounts of highly leveraged money would get lost if the trends had continued upward on commodities according to the natural supply/demand curve. So… the prices are being shoved down, hard by parties unknown for the next 3 days.
On Monday the artificial restraints will be gone, and all hell will break loose, I think.
The long term trend is towards a Greater Depression that will make the 1930s look like a cakewalk. The only hope is a radical shift in policy towards fiscal responsibility, but there currently aren’t any adults in charge of this country, so hope is slim.
–Mike–
May 29, 2008 at 7:05 pm
Don Marti
Why is it good news when something harmful becomes cheaper?
“Crack falls from $5 to $3 — more kids can afford it, and grownups can smoke more!”
May 29, 2008 at 7:10 pm
Andrew Leyden
What is interesting about this article and other more detailed articles on oil prices is how it shows the myriad of different factors that go into oil prices, and how kinks in certain parts can have knock-on effects to the chain. It’s not just ‘the Chinese’ or “OPEC’ or ‘Speculators’ but a huge number of factors that goes into the daily price of a barrel of oil.
May 30, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Ole Eichhorn
Whether you think lower oil prices are good news depends entirely on your point of view.
Higher oil prices will reduce consumption, reduce American dependence on foreign supply, and stimulate demand for alternative sources of entropy, which are all good things.
Yay, $200/barrel!
May 30, 2008 at 6:56 pm
RBM
As a regular reader of the theoildrum.com it’s gong to take more than a barrel of crude drop of $4 for me to call it ‘good news’ or even just news.
Geologic reality will be recognized eventually. Remember, Mother Nature bats last !
May 30, 2008 at 7:50 pm
RBM
Some history.:
Revisiting “The End of Cheap Oil” by Jean Laherrere