<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free range tweeter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/07/02/free-range-tweeter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/07/02/free-range-tweeter/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:38:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thejesh GN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/07/02/free-range-tweeter/comment-page-1/#comment-66886</link>
		<dc:creator>Thejesh GN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/07/02/free-range-tweeter/#comment-66886</guid>
		<description>Followed aka Subscribed
I am  http://identi.ca/thej</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Followed aka Subscribed<br />
I am  <a href="http://identi.ca/thej" rel="nofollow">http://identi.ca/thej</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Warot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/07/02/free-range-tweeter/comment-page-1/#comment-66863</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Warot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/07/02/free-range-tweeter/#comment-66863</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see the ball rolling. I&#039;m still interested in solving the core problem of scaling of a tweeting system. I think that a pair of machines (for reliability) should be able to handle all of the core messaging for Twitter or any subsequent clones.

Do you think anyone would use such a system if it were developed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see the ball rolling. I&#8217;m still interested in solving the core problem of scaling of a tweeting system. I think that a pair of machines (for reliability) should be able to handle all of the core messaging for Twitter or any subsequent clones.</p>
<p>Do you think anyone would use such a system if it were developed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Winer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/07/02/free-range-tweeter/comment-page-1/#comment-66751</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Winer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 22:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/07/02/free-range-tweeter/#comment-66751</guid>
		<description>Subscribed.

I&#039;m http://identi.ca/dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subscribed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m <a href="http://identi.ca/dave" rel="nofollow">http://identi.ca/dave</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
