Subscribe to feed
‹ What changed, exactly? • On the shore, with flowers ›
July 13, 2008 in Blogging, Ideas | 1 comment
I find myself among the “top ideators” on this list here. Flattered, but why no links? I can see a lot of names and sites on that page I’d like to follow.
Hey, what’s a hierarchy without links to subvert them?
John Caddell on July 13, 2008 at 8:11 pm
I am amazed at how little-used the hyperlink is. My high-school English teacher, Warren Allen Smith, admonished us continually to cite our sources, and the hyperlink is the most efficient, easiest and most direct way to do so (have you searched any book endnotes recently?).
When I read Tim Berners-Lee’s book, “Weaving the Web,” I was amazed how centrally he viewed the hyperlink as a tool of the web. Still, most people don’t use them enough.
Just link, everyone!
Comments are now closed.
@ioptio @petertoddbtc Good but at odds with the Paul Baran original: bit.ly/1GUz9dQ HT also to @khopper, who schools me on this.
Yesterday from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@aral @ioptio @petertoddbtc @IdentityWoman @heathr @petertoddbtc I like, in respect to networks. See Paul Baran: bit.ly/1GUz9dQ
@Flickr @Apple Why does flickr.com/appletv need this & where do I get the code? Thanks. #vrm pic.twitter.com/SlH896OS0n
About 4 days ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
Easter gathering at Noreen & Russell Bergin's. bit.ly/1JajKqz
About 4 days ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via IFTTT
Good piece. The @cluetrain response: start reading here newclues.cluetrain.com/#52 #vrm twitter.com/TechCrunch/sta…
About 5 days ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
Powered by WordPress and Tarski