Subscribe to feed
‹ What changed, exactly? • On the shore, with flowers ›
July 13, 2008 in Blogging, Ideas | 1 comment
I find myself among the “top ideators” on this list here. Flattered, but why no links? I can see a lot of names and sites on that page I’d like to follow.
Hey, what’s a hierarchy without links to subvert them?
John Caddell on July 13, 2008 at 8:11 pm
I am amazed at how little-used the hyperlink is. My high-school English teacher, Warren Allen Smith, admonished us continually to cite our sources, and the hyperlink is the most efficient, easiest and most direct way to do so (have you searched any book endnotes recently?).
When I read Tim Berners-Lee’s book, “Weaving the Web,” I was amazed how centrally he viewed the hyperlink as a tool of the web. Still, most people don’t use them enough.
Just link, everyone!
Comments are now closed.
@TechPRGuy Yep. Me too. That's why I miss what I could once (and still try to) do with blogging, explained here: bit.ly/1oq6aWW .
About 2 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@TechPRGuy My point is that "brand" is now a marketing fashion cliché. Easy to forget it was borrowed in the '30s from the cattle industry.
@TechPRGuy Re: @Sonos @Peets_Tweets @UniqloUSA @Apple @Costco Trader Joe's — I respect them too much to expect offers from any of them.#vrm
@TechPRGuy I like and respect @Sonos, @Peets_Tweets, @UniqloUSA , @Apple, The @NewYorker, etc. But I save my love for family & friends.
Death to #marketing clichés: bit.ly/1B2s71i Via @CustomerCommons #vrm
Powered by WordPress and Tarski