<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging X.x vs. What.what?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:03:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Wellbelove</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/comment-page-1/#comment-75895</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Wellbelove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/#comment-75895</guid>
		<description>I agree with Doc Searls comment, there will be very few bloggers who make money from their blog fewer that will make a lot. They will only be successful should they maintain their following - to do this they will need to maintain relevant and quality content. If there is an over focus on flogging so to be intrusive then the audience will simply go elsewhere.

For those starting out with blogging purely to make money a majority will be disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Doc Searls comment, there will be very few bloggers who make money from their blog fewer that will make a lot. They will only be successful should they maintain their following &#8211; to do this they will need to maintain relevant and quality content. If there is an over focus on flogging so to be intrusive then the audience will simply go elsewhere.</p>
<p>For those starting out with blogging purely to make money a majority will be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/comment-page-1/#comment-75876</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/#comment-75876</guid>
		<description>Pat, 

Fortunately, the Web is a big place. The sum of wheat has not declined, even if we seem to be drowning in chaff. 

Most bloggers who game their posts to attract eyeballs for advertisers are getting pittances. I&#039;d like to say that if you&#039;re blogging for bux you&#039;re not really blogging, but I do know a few rich bloggers, and blog publishers, who are doing it for love as well. Those are the ones that are like the best of the old newspaper publishers: they were in it to make money, sure; but mostly they were in it for love of the good their business did in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, </p>
<p>Fortunately, the Web is a big place. The sum of wheat has not declined, even if we seem to be drowning in chaff. </p>
<p>Most bloggers who game their posts to attract eyeballs for advertisers are getting pittances. I&#8217;d like to say that if you&#8217;re blogging for bux you&#8217;re not really blogging, but I do know a few rich bloggers, and blog publishers, who are doing it for love as well. Those are the ones that are like the best of the old newspaper publishers: they were in it to make money, sure; but mostly they were in it for love of the good their business did in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Phelan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/comment-page-1/#comment-75854</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Phelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/#comment-75854</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate this post, it brightened up a week where all I could see was an escape route from blogging.
My feedreader is becoming lighter and lighter and yet again this morning I am forwarded an email from a friend where a &quot;blogger&quot; has contacted them and money is in the first sentence.
It makes me sadder every day I see the growth of flogging and the reversal of strength of blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate this post, it brightened up a week where all I could see was an escape route from blogging.<br />
My feedreader is becoming lighter and lighter and yet again this morning I am forwarded an email from a friend where a &#8220;blogger&#8221; has contacted them and money is in the first sentence.<br />
It makes me sadder every day I see the growth of flogging and the reversal of strength of blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual heroes - revisited</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/comment-page-1/#comment-75843</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual heroes - revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/#comment-75843</guid>
		<description>[...] another one of mine:  Doc Searls.  He wrote a short but effective post about the current state of blogging, with links to other useful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another one of mine:  Doc Searls.  He wrote a short but effective post about the current state of blogging, with links to other useful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/comment-page-1/#comment-75830</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/#comment-75830</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mark. I&#039;m fine. Only one more minor diagnostic move before I&#039;m all clear, but right now that looks like a &lt;i&gt;pro forma&lt;/i&gt; thing. Nothing to worry about. Moving on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mark. I&#8217;m fine. Only one more minor diagnostic move before I&#8217;m all clear, but right now that looks like a <i>pro forma</i> thing. Nothing to worry about. Moving on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual heroes - revisited &#124; Broadcasting Brain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/comment-page-1/#comment-75822</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual heroes - revisited &#124; Broadcasting Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/#comment-75822</guid>
		<description>[...] another one of mine:  Doc Searls.  He wrote a short but effective post about the current state of blogging, with links to other useful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] another one of mine:  Doc Searls.  He wrote a short but effective post about the current state of blogging, with links to other useful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dykeman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/comment-page-1/#comment-75820</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dykeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/blogging-xx-vs-whatwhat/#comment-75820</guid>
		<description>I appreciate seeing this post and its links.

Hope you&#039;re back to good health following your recent problems of the pancreas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate seeing this post and its links.</p>
<p>Hope you&#8217;re back to good health following your recent problems of the pancreas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
