Comments on: Spammers du jour http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/ Same old blog, brand new place Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:09:22 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: too much spam « The daily blah blah http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/comment-page-1/#comment-89463 too much spam « The daily blah blah Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:57:35 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/#comment-89463 [...] Spammers du jour [...] [...] Spammers du jour [...]

]]> By: Doc Searls http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/comment-page-1/#comment-76092 Doc Searls Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:43:46 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/#comment-76092 bisco, I get nothing at that link right now; but I've passed your comment along to the appropriate geeks here. Thanks for the heads-up. bisco, I get nothing at that link right now; but I’ve passed your comment along to the appropriate geeks here. Thanks for the heads-up.

]]> By: bisco tech http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/comment-page-1/#comment-76082 bisco tech Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:02:55 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/#comment-76082 you think that spams a problem how about spam coming form the prestigious harvard lawschool, check this link for proof, its classic cloaking. i would handle this guys. blogs.law.harvard.edu/?supply=2717 you think that spams a problem how about spam coming form the prestigious harvard lawschool, check this link for proof, its classic cloaking. i would handle this guys.

 blogs.law.harvard.edu

]]> By: Mike Warot http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/comment-page-1/#comment-75824 Mike Warot Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:54:18 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/08/09/spammers-du-jour/#comment-75824 Doc you've hit upon a problem I found last night, which I wrote up at http://mikewarot.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-do-you-mark-your-enemies-in-social.html. Social networking is good in that you can give someone google juice, whuffie, or whatever... but as I've said before, there needs to be a more expressive way of linking to people. More about that here: http://mikewarot.blogspot.com/2006/02/expressive-linking.html The default of a link as a positive statement of support isn't expressive enough, and we all suffer for it. Expressivity is also an issue with HTML in general... you can't put notes on top of something... which sucks... but that's a different aspect of things. --Mike- Doc you’ve hit upon a problem I found last night, which I wrote up at http://mikewarot.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-do-you-mark-your-enemies-in-social.html.

Social networking is good in that you can give someone google juice, whuffie, or whatever… but as I’ve said before, there needs to be a more expressive way of linking to people. More about that here: http://mikewarot.blogspot.com/2006/02/expressive-linking.html

The default of a link as a positive statement of support isn’t expressive enough, and we all suffer for it.

Expressivity is also an issue with HTML in general… you can’t put notes on top of something… which sucks… but that’s a different aspect of things.

–Mike-

]]>