<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2012 campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:29:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why I&#8217;m Not Voting For Sarah Palin &#171; mere pixels</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-89800</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I&#8217;m Not Voting For Sarah Palin &#171; mere pixels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-89800</guid>
		<description>[...] Palin&#8217;s nomination. McCain&#8217;s decision to include her is either a bold calculation by a nefarious party or in inexplicable misstep on McCain&#8217;s part and bad decision-making. Inexperienced and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Palin&#8217;s nomination. McCain&#8217;s decision to include her is either a bold calculation by a nefarious party or in inexplicable misstep on McCain&#8217;s part and bad decision-making. Inexperienced and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cousin Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-89570</link>
		<dc:creator>Cousin Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-89570</guid>
		<description>good analysis but overlooks the Supreme Court -- but then the Republicans only hide behind and use the &quot;family values&quot; issues anyway to divert attention and change the subject (see what Palin will do in the debate--prediction here)  so Jan&#039;s analysis may still be valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good analysis but overlooks the Supreme Court &#8212; but then the Republicans only hide behind and use the &#8220;family values&#8221; issues anyway to divert attention and change the subject (see what Palin will do in the debate&#8211;prediction here)  so Jan&#8217;s analysis may still be valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-89559</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-89559</guid>
		<description>Doc:

All of this assumes that there will be a Republican Party

See David Brooks
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?em

&quot;House Republicans led the way and will get most of the blame. It has been interesting to watch them on their single-minded mission to destroy the Republican Party. Not long ago, they led an anti-immigration crusade that drove away Hispanic support. Then, too, they listened to the loudest and angriest voices in their party, oblivious to the complicated anxieties that lurk in most American minds.

Now they have once again confused talk radio with reality&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc:</p>
<p>All of this assumes that there will be a Republican Party</p>
<p>See David Brooks<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?em" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?em</a></p>
<p>&#8220;House Republicans led the way and will get most of the blame. It has been interesting to watch them on their single-minded mission to destroy the Republican Party. Not long ago, they led an anti-immigration crusade that drove away Hispanic support. Then, too, they listened to the loudest and angriest voices in their party, oblivious to the complicated anxieties that lurk in most American minds.</p>
<p>Now they have once again confused talk radio with reality&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-89409</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 06:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-89409</guid>
		<description>Doc, my problem is that it is extremely expensive to &quot;stop contributing to it, as best we can.&quot;  Global warming WILL have negative effects on some people (maybe not those of us who live in the retreating paths of the glaciers), and if we really (REALLY) care about global warming, we should save our money in preparation to help those who will suffer.

If we want to help, we should HELP, and not just make nicey-nice among environmentalists whose faith that reducing CO2 will reduce warming is unshakable by any facts.  If you read some of the skeptics, they say &quot;yes, there is warming, yes CO2 increases warming, but NO, all the catastrophe scenarios require a feedback which has never been seen in the past.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, my problem is that it is extremely expensive to &#8220;stop contributing to it, as best we can.&#8221;  Global warming WILL have negative effects on some people (maybe not those of us who live in the retreating paths of the glaciers), and if we really (REALLY) care about global warming, we should save our money in preparation to help those who will suffer.</p>
<p>If we want to help, we should HELP, and not just make nicey-nice among environmentalists whose faith that reducing CO2 will reduce warming is unshakable by any facts.  If you read some of the skeptics, they say &#8220;yes, there is warming, yes CO2 increases warming, but NO, all the catastrophe scenarios require a feedback which has never been seen in the past.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Taht</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-89078</link>
		<dc:creator>David Taht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-89078</guid>
		<description>I think Jan is dead on (and best regards to her) in her analysis. 

I would have liked it if McCain hadn&#039;t shown up at the last debate and the other presidential candidates did.

There should be some great comedy tonight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jan is dead on (and best regards to her) in her analysis. </p>
<p>I would have liked it if McCain hadn&#8217;t shown up at the last debate and the other presidential candidates did.</p>
<p>There should be some great comedy tonight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hughes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-89061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-89061</guid>
		<description>Can somebody fill me in why Labour time in office coming to an end will be a problem for the next president of the USA. Seems pretty much irrelevant who is in power in the UK...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can somebody fill me in why Labour time in office coming to an end will be a problem for the next president of the USA. Seems pretty much irrelevant who is in power in the UK&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-89006</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-89006</guid>
		<description>Julian,

I&#039;ve been one of the last people to call Palin stupid. Or the McCain people, either. But they threw a Hail Mary with this one, and so far it&#039;s no touchdown.

Still, one has to question McCain&#039;s judgement in picking her, and hers for accepting the invite. What she should have said was &quot;Thanks, but I&#039;m not ready. I&#039;ve only been on the job in Alaska for a couple years and I&#039;m in no position to take over as president of the whole country. I have zero experience at the national and international levels, and that&#039;s going to show under hard media scrutiny. Call me in four years and let&#039;s see where we&#039;re at then.&quot;

Too bad &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Napolitano&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Janet Napolitano&lt;/a&gt; isn&#039;t a Republican. Shes smart, funny and has a pile of Good Sense. if McCain had picked her instead, they&#039;d have kicked ass. Come to think of it, there must have been &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; Republican out there that could have done the job for McCain. Romney must be looking awful good by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been one of the last people to call Palin stupid. Or the McCain people, either. But they threw a Hail Mary with this one, and so far it&#8217;s no touchdown.</p>
<p>Still, one has to question McCain&#8217;s judgement in picking her, and hers for accepting the invite. What she should have said was &#8220;Thanks, but I&#8217;m not ready. I&#8217;ve only been on the job in Alaska for a couple years and I&#8217;m in no position to take over as president of the whole country. I have zero experience at the national and international levels, and that&#8217;s going to show under hard media scrutiny. Call me in four years and let&#8217;s see where we&#8217;re at then.&#8221;</p>
<p>Too bad <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Napolitano" rel="nofollow">Janet Napolitano</a> isn&#8217;t a Republican. Shes smart, funny and has a pile of Good Sense. if McCain had picked her instead, they&#8217;d have kicked ass. Come to think of it, there must have been <i>some</i> Republican out there that could have done the job for McCain. Romney must be looking awful good by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-89004</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-89004</guid>
		<description>Russ, I&#039;m somewhat with you on global warming.

North America&#039;s face from the nose* upward has only been revealed by retreating ice in the last dozen or two thousand years. Humans have been in a position to contribute to that only in the last two hundred years or less.

On the other hand, we&#039;ve done our damn best, and it&#039;s hard to believe we&#039;ve had zero effect.

As for what we can do to stop or reverse global warming, it only makes sense to stop contributing to it, as best we can. We should also have faith, regardless, that sometime in the next few dozen thousand years the trend will reverse, the Great Glacier will return, and your grave and mine will be plowed into Dixie.

*Lake Michigan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, I&#8217;m somewhat with you on global warming.</p>
<p>North America&#8217;s face from the nose* upward has only been revealed by retreating ice in the last dozen or two thousand years. Humans have been in a position to contribute to that only in the last two hundred years or less.</p>
<p>On the other hand, we&#8217;ve done our damn best, and it&#8217;s hard to believe we&#8217;ve had zero effect.</p>
<p>As for what we can do to stop or reverse global warming, it only makes sense to stop contributing to it, as best we can. We should also have faith, regardless, that sometime in the next few dozen thousand years the trend will reverse, the Great Glacier will return, and your grave and mine will be plowed into Dixie.</p>
<p>*Lake Michigan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Bond</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-88914</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-88914</guid>
		<description>You know how Palin was picked? They went round all the possibilities looking for someone who didn&#039;t mind losing. And she was the last one on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know how Palin was picked? They went round all the possibilities looking for someone who didn&#8217;t mind losing. And she was the last one on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Politics in the Zeros. Anti-war, global warming, peak oil, progressive politics &#187; Why Republicans secretly want McCain to lose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/09/29/the-2012-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-88913</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics in the Zeros. Anti-war, global warming, peak oil, progressive politics &#187; Why Republicans secretly want McCain to lose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=985#comment-88913</guid>
		<description>[...] Doc Searl&#8217;s sister tells why. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doc Searl&#8217;s sister tells why. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
