<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being Robert Scoble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:09:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: echovar &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Permission To Go Live: Don&#8217;t Think Twice, It&#8217;s Alright</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-91491</link>
		<dc:creator>echovar &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Permission To Go Live: Don&#8217;t Think Twice, It&#8217;s Alright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-91491</guid>
		<description>[...] Doc Searls writes about the new way that writing is produced: Traditional journalism is static. Its basic units are the article, the story, the piece. The new journalism is live. It doesn’t have a basic unit any more than a river or a storm have a basic unit. It’s process, not product. Even these things we call posts, texts, tweets and wikis are less unitary than contributory. They add to a flow, which in turn adds to what we know. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doc Searls writes about the new way that writing is produced: Traditional journalism is static. Its basic units are the article, the story, the piece. The new journalism is live. It doesn’t have a basic unit any more than a river or a storm have a basic unit. It’s process, not product. Even these things we call posts, texts, tweets and wikis are less unitary than contributory. They add to a flow, which in turn adds to what we know. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-90531</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-90531</guid>
		<description>Well, Dan, it&#039;s a big Web. I&#039;ll bet the people he interviews can be heard elsewhere as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Dan, it&#8217;s a big Web. I&#8217;ll bet the people he interviews can be heard elsewhere as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOB Business Cafe 10-03-08 - Liz Strauss at Successful Blog - Thinking, writing, business ideas . . . You’re only a stranger once.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-90484</link>
		<dc:creator>SOB Business Cafe 10-03-08 - Liz Strauss at Successful Blog - Thinking, writing, business ideas . . . You’re only a stranger once.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-90484</guid>
		<description>[...] Being Robert Scoble  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Being Robert Scoble  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Guy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-90424</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-90424</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t christen it &quot;being Scobleized&quot;; the guy is an annoying hack who yells and giggles overtop of the people I&#039;d rather be hearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t christen it &#8220;being Scobleized&#8221;; the guy is an annoying hack who yells and giggles overtop of the people I&#8217;d rather be hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links - 3rd October 2008 &#171; Curiously Persistent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-90319</link>
		<dc:creator>Links - 3rd October 2008 &#171; Curiously Persistent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-90319</guid>
		<description>[...] community-based collections, where articles are continually updated and evolving (as in Wikipedia). Doc Searls disagrees, arguing that the structure of the web isn&#8217;t conducive to a single source of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] community-based collections, where articles are continually updated and evolving (as in Wikipedia). Doc Searls disagrees, arguing that the structure of the web isn&#8217;t conducive to a single source of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayala Rahav</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-90284</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayala Rahav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-90284</guid>
		<description>I think you are taking it only part of the way when you say “We’re increasing the worth of ourselves as the sovereign and independent units we call human beings” and “To be Scobleized is to be human, and to grow. Because that’s what we do at our best.” 

As the web is increasingly a natural habitat for us, where, how and through what channels we express ourselves, converse and interact is as fragmented, eclectic and diversified as our way of free and associative thinking. It’s not that we are all being Scobelized or “jazzed” (great metaphor), it’s that our contexts are dynamic, scattered across all channels of communication, in short: it’s all over the “place”. 

Today, when you want to follow Scoble’s threads of thought live, as you call it, as it evolves through all the channels he uses, you have to actively aggregate it and tailor the jigsaw puzzle. 
This is a great example of how the web is becoming the people’s web and Scoble, you, me, everyone, are individuals atoms (or Itoms as we like to call it http://I4c-corp.com ) in a people’s grid. 

To be able to really follow his mind and ideas in the same natural way that he expresses them, through all his channels of communication – a mind shift is needed for taking a holistic view of contexting people and not just their fragmented interactions. 

Enabling such a holistic harmonious view, without fear of a big brother with all its implications, begs for an Icentered world (www.icentered.oerg) where each of us alone has the key to her holistic view and the ability to share at her discretion.  That will turn not only journalism, but all our scattered web based conversations into a true “web of life” with individually unique finger prints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are taking it only part of the way when you say “We’re increasing the worth of ourselves as the sovereign and independent units we call human beings” and “To be Scobleized is to be human, and to grow. Because that’s what we do at our best.” </p>
<p>As the web is increasingly a natural habitat for us, where, how and through what channels we express ourselves, converse and interact is as fragmented, eclectic and diversified as our way of free and associative thinking. It’s not that we are all being Scobelized or “jazzed” (great metaphor), it’s that our contexts are dynamic, scattered across all channels of communication, in short: it’s all over the “place”. </p>
<p>Today, when you want to follow Scoble’s threads of thought live, as you call it, as it evolves through all the channels he uses, you have to actively aggregate it and tailor the jigsaw puzzle.<br />
This is a great example of how the web is becoming the people’s web and Scoble, you, me, everyone, are individuals atoms (or Itoms as we like to call it <a href="http://I4c-corp.com" rel="nofollow">http://I4c-corp.com</a> ) in a people’s grid. </p>
<p>To be able to really follow his mind and ideas in the same natural way that he expresses them, through all his channels of communication – a mind shift is needed for taking a holistic view of contexting people and not just their fragmented interactions. </p>
<p>Enabling such a holistic harmonious view, without fear of a big brother with all its implications, begs for an Icentered world (www.icentered.oerg) where each of us alone has the key to her holistic view and the ability to share at her discretion.  That will turn not only journalism, but all our scattered web based conversations into a true “web of life” with individually unique finger prints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Warot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-90076</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Warot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-90076</guid>
		<description>I like Robert Scoble, he seems like a cool guy, was pleasant and friendly to me the one time I called his cell. I can&#039;t handle the flow he swims in though... RSS and Twitter, and the always on life just don&#039;t work for me... it&#039;s an impedance mismatch.

I like to take things a bit slower, but the tech for someone like me isn&#039;t here yet. I know some of the pain points for myself are wildly different, because I live a live split between work/commute/home. 

My personal laptop is FULL ( &lt; 100 Mb free until I gave in and pruned a bit this morning), but my machine at work is a desktop which can essentially be infinite.  Syncing works only if I keep free space on the laptop, which is a huge pain.

There&#039;s no internet on the train, which means I&#039;m disconnected for 2 separate 45 minute commutes each day, during which I have peace and quiet (with headphones), but no net to interact with.

I have a 2 year old daughter, so there&#039;s no real free time until she&#039;s asleep... and that&#039;s sleep deficit spending.

Wow... maybe this should just be a blog post instead?

Nah... I&#039;ll hit Submit Comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Robert Scoble, he seems like a cool guy, was pleasant and friendly to me the one time I called his cell. I can&#8217;t handle the flow he swims in though&#8230; RSS and Twitter, and the always on life just don&#8217;t work for me&#8230; it&#8217;s an impedance mismatch.</p>
<p>I like to take things a bit slower, but the tech for someone like me isn&#8217;t here yet. I know some of the pain points for myself are wildly different, because I live a live split between work/commute/home. </p>
<p>My personal laptop is FULL ( &lt; 100 Mb free until I gave in and pruned a bit this morning), but my machine at work is a desktop which can essentially be infinite.  Syncing works only if I keep free space on the laptop, which is a huge pain.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no internet on the train, which means I&#8217;m disconnected for 2 separate 45 minute commutes each day, during which I have peace and quiet (with headphones), but no net to interact with.</p>
<p>I have a 2 year old daughter, so there&#8217;s no real free time until she&#8217;s asleep&#8230; and that&#8217;s sleep deficit spending.</p>
<p>Wow&#8230; maybe this should just be a blog post instead?</p>
<p>Nah&#8230; I&#8217;ll hit Submit Comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 9GiantSteps &#183; On Drucker and the &#8220;Live Web&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-90029</link>
		<dc:creator>9GiantSteps &#183; On Drucker and the &#8220;Live Web&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-90029</guid>
		<description>[...] Love this blurb and the entire piece from my new favorite blog: Doc Searl&#8217;s Weblog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Love this blurb and the entire piece from my new favorite blog: Doc Searl&#8217;s Weblog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redefining Journalism &#171; Glen Campbell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/being-robert-scoble/comment-page-1/#comment-90019</link>
		<dc:creator>Redefining Journalism &#171; Glen Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/02/liverolling/#comment-90019</guid>
		<description>[...] a comment &#187;  Bookmark this blog post. Go ahead, save it to your delicious feed or mark it in your browser. I&#8217;ll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a comment &raquo;  Bookmark this blog post. Go ahead, save it to your delicious feed or mark it in your browser. I&#8217;ll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
