<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On behalf of blogging,</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:17:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Guenther</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-216825</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Guenther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/#comment-216825</guid>
		<description>The noise-to-signal ratio of Twit-land, Farcebook, etc., is huge. They have some use, but can&#039;t compete with a garden variety blog. Too much non-information. TMNI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The noise-to-signal ratio of Twit-land, Farcebook, etc., is huge. They have some use, but can&#8217;t compete with a garden variety blog. Too much non-information. TMNI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Reyes-McDavis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-99570</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Reyes-McDavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/#comment-99570</guid>
		<description>Doc, I agree with david, blogs have an amazing ability to form purpose based communities.  With the technology now available in open-source platforms like Wordpress - blogs, as they are, contribute to the online community in ways Twitter and Flickr never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, I agree with david, blogs have an amazing ability to form purpose based communities.  With the technology now available in open-source platforms like Wordpress &#8211; blogs, as they are, contribute to the online community in ways Twitter and Flickr never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-96686</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/#comment-96686</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Don. Good point about &quot;the tool of choice for big-picture coordination between projects&quot; for the free software community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Don. Good point about &#8220;the tool of choice for big-picture coordination between projects&#8221; for the free software community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david cushman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-96659</link>
		<dc:creator>david cushman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/#comment-96659</guid>
		<description>I still love the blog for one simple reason - it is the least silo&#039;d of all the ways we can form communities of purpose on the web. Facebook, twitter, flickr, huge as they are, just don&#039;t have the sheer connection potential of blogs (via rss and search).
I won&#039;t be giving up on mine until someone comes up with a better way of sharing my metadata. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still love the blog for one simple reason &#8211; it is the least silo&#8217;d of all the ways we can form communities of purpose on the web. Facebook, twitter, flickr, huge as they are, just don&#8217;t have the sheer connection potential of blogs (via rss and search).<br />
I won&#8217;t be giving up on mine until someone comes up with a better way of sharing my metadata. <img src='http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Marti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-96601</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/#comment-96601</guid>
		<description>Doc, I remember your earlier point about blogging as answers to email, only public.  If you&#039;re going to write an answer anyway you might as well paste a copy into a blogging tool.

Every communication tool seems to have a boom, a bust, then a set of steady users. In the free software community blogging seems to be the tool of choice for big-picture coordination between projects --  you can&#039;t be on the mailing list of all the projects whose work interoperates with yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, I remember your earlier point about blogging as answers to email, only public.  If you&#8217;re going to write an answer anyway you might as well paste a copy into a blogging tool.</p>
<p>Every communication tool seems to have a boom, a bust, then a set of steady users. In the free software community blogging seems to be the tool of choice for big-picture coordination between projects &#8212;  you can&#8217;t be on the mailing list of all the projects whose work interoperates with yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanderleun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-96550</link>
		<dc:creator>vanderleun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/#comment-96550</guid>
		<description>Facebook boosters might want to consider this droll estimate of Facebook&#039;s carbon hoofprint:
===
Hence on an estimated ballpark - Facebook daily consumes 924,000 KiloWatt-Hours with per capita of 3.08 KWh . Annually the per capita figure would be 1124 KWh /year or equivalent to emission of 0.75 ton of green house CO2(Carbon footprint) which is half of NY city’s carbon footprint.
=====

Other amusing stats at

http://www.trendsspotting.com/blog/?p=487</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook boosters might want to consider this droll estimate of Facebook&#8217;s carbon hoofprint:<br />
===<br />
Hence on an estimated ballpark &#8211; Facebook daily consumes 924,000 KiloWatt-Hours with per capita of 3.08 KWh . Annually the per capita figure would be 1124 KWh /year or equivalent to emission of 0.75 ton of green house CO2(Carbon footprint) which is half of NY city’s carbon footprint.<br />
=====</p>
<p>Other amusing stats at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trendsspotting.com/blog/?p=487" rel="nofollow">http://www.trendsspotting.com/blog/?p=487</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Reiser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-96538</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Reiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2008/10/21/on-behalf-of-blogging/#comment-96538</guid>
		<description>Came to the same conclusion earlier today (http://seanreiser.com/content/blog-dead-long-live-blogging).  I agree with the concept that I&#039;ll never compete with the media companies, that&#039;s not why I do this.  I secretly suspect that Calacanis retired from blogging because competing with them and was a victim of his own success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came to the same conclusion earlier today (<a href="http://seanreiser.com/content/blog-dead-long-live-blogging)" rel="nofollow">http://seanreiser.com/content/blog-dead-long-live-blogging)</a>.  I agree with the concept that I&#8217;ll never compete with the media companies, that&#8217;s not why I do this.  I secretly suspect that Calacanis retired from blogging because competing with them and was a victim of his own success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
