<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silos End</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:02:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Runtux Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud computing, Vendor Lock-In and the Future</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-194066</link>
		<dc:creator>Runtux Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cloud computing, Vendor Lock-In and the Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-194066</guid>
		<description>[...] or decide to host our own service. But companies won&#8217;t do it for us. As Doc Searls notes in Silos End: &#8220;These problems cannot be solved by the companies themselves. Companies make silos. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or decide to host our own service. But companies won&#8217;t do it for us. As Doc Searls notes in Silos End: &#8220;These problems cannot be solved by the companies themselves. Companies make silos. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Effective destruction of Customer relationship through efficiency initiatives &#8212; EVOLUTION OF BPR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-162601</link>
		<dc:creator>Effective destruction of Customer relationship through efficiency initiatives &#8212; EVOLUTION OF BPR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 18:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-162601</guid>
		<description>[...] Searls wrote about this disconnect For evidence, look no farther than two of the most annoying developments in the history of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Searls wrote about this disconnect For evidence, look no farther than two of the most annoying developments in the history of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Dick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-162492</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 11:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-162492</guid>
		<description>The article you link to does not seem at all familiar to me, so that probably isn&#039;t the one I saw.  I believe the one I saw was not a scholarly paper, but an article for the general audience.  I don&#039;t recall much detail, though.

I guess it is reassuring that you believe that few of the executives you have known were sociopaths.  I haven&#039;t known many and wondered whether the speculation in the article I read was accurate.  However, I&#039;m a little surprised when you indicate that sociopaths are disliked.  

My recollection is that one of the characteristics of a sociopath is that he is very good at gaining the trust, and even admiration, of those around him, when that contributes to his goals.  And another is that he is generally quite intelligent.  So could it be that, of those executives you have known, more than you realize were sociopaths?  I suppose that if you knew them for a long time, you&#039;d eventually be able to recognize the sociopaths, so if you are speaking of ones you have known a long time, then your experience is more reassuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article you link to does not seem at all familiar to me, so that probably isn&#8217;t the one I saw.  I believe the one I saw was not a scholarly paper, but an article for the general audience.  I don&#8217;t recall much detail, though.</p>
<p>I guess it is reassuring that you believe that few of the executives you have known were sociopaths.  I haven&#8217;t known many and wondered whether the speculation in the article I read was accurate.  However, I&#8217;m a little surprised when you indicate that sociopaths are disliked.  </p>
<p>My recollection is that one of the characteristics of a sociopath is that he is very good at gaining the trust, and even admiration, of those around him, when that contributes to his goals.  And another is that he is generally quite intelligent.  So could it be that, of those executives you have known, more than you realize were sociopaths?  I suppose that if you knew them for a long time, you&#8217;d eventually be able to recognize the sociopaths, so if you are speaking of ones you have known a long time, then your experience is more reassuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-162361</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 03:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-162361</guid>
		<description>Keith, might it be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/2960020302.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this source&lt;/a&gt;? In any case, I&#039;ve known many executives through many years in business and I can&#039;t name a single characteristic common to all of them -- other, perhaps, than plain intelligence. Sure, I&#039;ve known a few sociopaths, but I wouldn&#039;t call that a qualification for anything other than dislike by others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, might it be <a href="http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/2960020302.html" rel="nofollow">this source</a>? In any case, I&#8217;ve known many executives through many years in business and I can&#8217;t name a single characteristic common to all of them &#8212; other, perhaps, than plain intelligence. Sure, I&#8217;ve known a few sociopaths, but I wouldn&#8217;t call that a qualification for anything other than dislike by others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Dick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-162267</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 21:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-162267</guid>
		<description>In reference to Karl&#039;s post, above: I don&#039;t recall where I saw it, but sometime a few years ago, I read an article that made the claim that most of the attributes of a sociopath were the same attributes that enabled one to climb the corporate ladder.  If true, that would explain a lot, wouldn&#039;t it?  Also if true, is there anything that could be done to change things so the sociopaths no longer become top executives?  I kind of doubt it, but would love to be proven wrong on that.  (Note, the claim is not that all executives are sociopaths, but that some probably are.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reference to Karl&#8217;s post, above: I don&#8217;t recall where I saw it, but sometime a few years ago, I read an article that made the claim that most of the attributes of a sociopath were the same attributes that enabled one to climb the corporate ladder.  If true, that would explain a lot, wouldn&#8217;t it?  Also if true, is there anything that could be done to change things so the sociopaths no longer become top executives?  I kind of doubt it, but would love to be proven wrong on that.  (Note, the claim is not that all executives are sociopaths, but that some probably are.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-162043</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 07:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-162043</guid>
		<description>Haha, this is funny, Doc, but I started to post on how a silo based on a foundation of open data isn&#039;t a silo at all, but more like a building.  Then I went to find something that you&#039;d written about silos only to find that you&#039;d posted something today!

http://opensource.org/node/426</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, this is funny, Doc, but I started to post on how a silo based on a foundation of open data isn&#8217;t a silo at all, but more like a building.  Then I went to find something that you&#8217;d written about silos only to find that you&#8217;d posted something today!</p>
<p><a href="http://opensource.org/node/426" rel="nofollow">http://opensource.org/node/426</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Warot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-161974</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Warot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 02:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-161974</guid>
		<description>I think what you&#039;re doing is useful and valuable... but I can&#039;t help but worry (A LOT) about the insecure ends of the internet.... nothing out there is going to make for a usably secure system for end users, not SE Linux, nor anything from Microsoft nor Apple... because none of them support Capability based security.


Because this major flaw will continue to exist, anything useful on the net MUST be done in a silo so that someone can keep an eye on things, and spread the cost of management of that security around to all the users (via ads or some other cross subsidy).


There are some major things that are broken in the world, but they are too subtle to explain in less than a book....  which makes it very, very hard to communicate to the masses.



Sorry for the rant... but I had to let it out somewhere... somewhere I hope can make a difference.


--Mike--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what you&#8217;re doing is useful and valuable&#8230; but I can&#8217;t help but worry (A LOT) about the insecure ends of the internet&#8230;. nothing out there is going to make for a usably secure system for end users, not SE Linux, nor anything from Microsoft nor Apple&#8230; because none of them support Capability based security.</p>
<p>Because this major flaw will continue to exist, anything useful on the net MUST be done in a silo so that someone can keep an eye on things, and spread the cost of management of that security around to all the users (via ads or some other cross subsidy).</p>
<p>There are some major things that are broken in the world, but they are too subtle to explain in less than a book&#8230;.  which makes it very, very hard to communicate to the masses.</p>
<p>Sorry for the rant&#8230; but I had to let it out somewhere&#8230; somewhere I hope can make a difference.</p>
<p>&#8211;Mike&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-05-01 (Jarrett House North)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-161963</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-05-01 (Jarrett House North)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 02:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-161963</guid>
		<description>[...] Doc Searls Weblog · Silos End Digging into the Cluetrain, ten years on. (tags: cluetrain docsearls marketing) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doc Searls Weblog · Silos End Digging into the Cluetrain, ten years on. (tags: cluetrain docsearls marketing) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Searls</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-161901</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Searls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-161901</guid>
		<description>Karl, 

Apologies for the moderation system. After passing through the mod system the first time, everything else posts right away. In addition, we have a new system here based on the latest Wordpress Whatever, and I&#039;m still not familiar with it. Used to be all comments awaiting moderation were highlighted. Now I have to go looking for them. Or so it seems. Still exploring here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl, </p>
<p>Apologies for the moderation system. After passing through the mod system the first time, everything else posts right away. In addition, we have a new system here based on the latest Wordpress Whatever, and I&#8217;m still not familiar with it. Used to be all comments awaiting moderation were highlighted. Now I have to go looking for them. Or so it seems. Still exploring here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2009/05/01/silos-end/comment-page-1/#comment-161889</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/?p=1380#comment-161889</guid>
		<description>Oh, sure, after I wait 20 minutes and repost my comment, NOW it says &#039;Your comment is awaiting moderation&#039;.  *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sure, after I wait 20 minutes and repost my comment, NOW it says &#8216;Your comment is awaiting moderation&#8217;.  *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
