<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wikileaks Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2010/07/28/the-wikileaks-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2010/07/28/the-wikileaks-story/</link>
	<description>Same old blog, brand new place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:11:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Owens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2010/07/28/the-wikileaks-story/comment-page-1/#comment-277804</link>
		<dc:creator>James Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2010/07/28/the-wikileaks-story/#comment-277804</guid>
		<description>The problems of this story are also, um, the war in Afghanistan? And what makes that war MEGO is the utter unwillingness of big J journalism to allow anti-war movements to reach large audiences through mainstream news. The narrow range of debate and viewpoints given legitimacy or even representation by big-J journalism assures the continuance of the war(s). Rather than the story being &#039;too big and complex&#039; big J journalists and the mainstream news entities they work for are part of or aligned with the war makers. After all, journalists can&#039;t get Big by alienating their Big Media bosses or Big Insider sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problems of this story are also, um, the war in Afghanistan? And what makes that war MEGO is the utter unwillingness of big J journalism to allow anti-war movements to reach large audiences through mainstream news. The narrow range of debate and viewpoints given legitimacy or even representation by big-J journalism assures the continuance of the war(s). Rather than the story being &#8216;too big and complex&#8217; big J journalists and the mainstream news entities they work for are part of or aligned with the war makers. After all, journalists can&#8217;t get Big by alienating their Big Media bosses or Big Insider sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2010/07/28/the-wikileaks-story/comment-page-1/#comment-275413</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/doc/2010/07/28/the-wikileaks-story/#comment-275413</guid>
		<description>I much prefer #wookieleaks, the most retweeted instance of which is &quot;Recently released documents reveal that yes, those WERE the droids you were looking for.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I much prefer #wookieleaks, the most retweeted instance of which is &#8220;Recently released documents reveal that yes, those WERE the droids you were looking for.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
