Comments on: Facebook’s shark-jump advertising moves

By: Hvorfor er Google+ ikke en stor succes? | Hennings blog

Hvorfor er Google+ ikke en stor succes? | Hennings blog — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:22:04 +0000

[...] som ovenfor. Fair nok, jeg har ikke fortalt Facebook at jeg er lykkeligt gift. Men den navnkundige Doc Searls har fortalt Facebook at han har været gift i 23 år og alligevel synes Facebook at et par dating [...]

By: » VRM Roundup ProjectVRM

» VRM Roundup ProjectVRM — Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:16:29 +0000

[...] Searls: Facebook’s shark-jump advertising moves, Toward opt-in advertising, How advertising can regulate [...]

By: Facebook’s shark-jump advertising moves | turnings :: daniel berlinger

Facebook’s shark-jump advertising moves | turnings :: daniel berlinger — Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:20:21 +0000

[...] Facebook’s shark-jump advertising moves: I’ve been told by adtech professionals that a funny thing about their business is that Google and Facebook are terribly jealous of each other: Google is jealous of Facebook because Facebook can get especially personal with its users, while Facebook is jealous of Google because Google can advertise all over the Web. And yet both are missing real human relationships with their users, because the users are not customers. They are the products being sold to the companies’ real customers, which are advertisers. [...]

By: Hot Social Media and Tech Stories for week ending March 11, 2013 — Joe Spake's Weblog

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:19:55 +0000

[...] Doc Searls Weblog · Facebook’s shark-jump advertising moves "It’s hard to imagine a company that has more “big data” about its users than Facebook does, or better means for delivering truly relevant ads to individuals. And yet Facebook’s advertising is mostly ignored, unwelcome or worse." [...]

By: Retvig

Retvig — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 02:19:54 +0000

What never seizes to amaze me is that everyone is always saying that Facebook has soooooo much data that they will be able to serve the most targeted ads, and everybody keeps getting nothing but irrelevant nonsense.

By: Jacobus

Jacobus — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:55:27 +0000

Facebook is driving me up the wall anyway, not only with ads. They just announced a new time line. Why? Did we ask for it? I sure didn’t. I really don’t get these companies that keep being “innovative” and I think that one day, one of those changes will mean their downfall. And yes, pretty annoying that they think you want to cheat your wife. Duh!

By: Edward Matthew

Edward Matthew — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:41:00 +0000

The Facebook ads nothing like general advertisement, simply Facebook puts this paid advertisement. I think some irrelevant adds should not show in our profile page. But there are no filtration and all adds are showing.

By: Shane Latham

Shane Latham — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 08:34:43 +0000

This post is really incredible, one of the most helpful I have ever read,indeed.

By: Doc Searls

Doc Searls — Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:57:26 +0000

No biggie, Brent. Doubting anybody’s wisdom tends to be a good thing. I doubt mine all the time.

By: Marc's Voice » Second week of March, 2013 blogging

Marc's Voice » Second week of March, 2013 blogging — Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:08:54 +0000

[...] Indeed it looks like we’re watching the Shark-Jumpeth – right in front of our eyes! [...]